Envelope-to: dave@picks.force9.co.uk Delivery-date: Fri, 10 Jun 2005 15:19:54 +0100 Received: by ptb-mxcore13.plus.net with spam-scanned (PlusNet MXCore v2.00) id 1DgkMT-0008Hu-HQ for dave@picks.force9.co.uk; Fri, 10 Jun 2005 15:19:54 +0100 Received: from post.thorcom.com ([193.82.116.20]) by ptb-mxcore13.plus.net with esmtp (PlusNet MXCore v2.00) id 1DgkMT-0008Gt-CP for dave@picks.force9.co.uk; Fri, 10 Jun 2005 15:19:53 +0100 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1DgkLu-0001g2-TS for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Fri, 10 Jun 2005 15:19:18 +0100 Received: from [193.82.116.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1DgkLu-0001ft-7w for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 10 Jun 2005 15:19:18 +0100 Received: from smtp813.mail.ukl.yahoo.com ([217.12.12.203]) by relay1.thorcom.net with smtp (Exim 4.51) id 1DgkR5-0004Wk-4M for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 10 Jun 2005 15:24:40 +0100 Received: (qmail 4803 invoked from network); 10 Jun 2005 14:19:11 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO Main) (Alan.Melia@81.131.142.174 with login) by smtp813.mail.ukl.yahoo.com with SMTP; 10 Jun 2005 14:19:09 -0000 Message-ID: <000601c56dc7$611f7c20$6507a8c0@Main> From: "Alan Melia" To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <003f01c56cb1$8567a2e0$0201a8c0@private.network> <000101c56da7$42836300$3daee150@g1l5x3> Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2005 15:19:09 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4522.1200 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4522.1200 Subject: LF: Re: Unwanted LF radiation Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-PN-SpamFiltered: by PlusNet MXCore (v2.00) Hi Howard, although an ex BT man I dont reckon to know anything about telephones really !! One thought occurs to me that in the past there have been problems due to faulty devices in terminals (instruments) radiating noise and / or oscillations from the lines. Assuming it is your own drop that is a problem, can you temporarily disconnect all equipment from your master socket, and then reinstall one at a time. I am thinking of telephone instrument problems rather than data units. If that is not the problem the other area I have found with wideband noise are fluorescent light particularly when the starter is getting a bit old.....some still strike after the tube is lit. This of course will not result in the noise being radiated by the drop. There is of course a BIG signal located at 100kHz which might be "showing through the noise" ....Loran-C. There were suggestions that BT would be starting up an experimental transmission this month but I have seen no signs of this yet, and I guess you are about as far north in Skipton as I am to the south east (Ipswich) of Rugby..... so we should see similar strengths. It might be easier to locate if there were some recognisable "lines", most noises I see are eithe 100Hz or 50Hz somewhere and be traced to a number of known causes. I find ARGO very useful for tracking these using the RX audio. Both John G4GVC and Peter G3LDO have reported these kinds of noises before, but with no definitive source found. Cheers de Alan G3NYK ----- Original Message ----- From: "Howard Aspinall" To: Sent: 10 June 2005 11:27 Subject: LF: Unwanted LF radiation > This might be just a bit off the beaten track for the reflector, despite being LF orientated, > but I wonder if anyone has any useful observations or information they might pass on. > > Whilst tracking down some noise interference problems, I discovered sizeable amounts > of wideband RF between 75 and 130 KHz. This manifests itself as > "smooth" noise. It extends outside these frequency parameters well into long/medium > waveband, and is radiating from the overhead BT telephone drop line. Broadband > internet RF seems the most likely culprit (there being a null between 130 and 140 KHz), > but we do not have any broadband facility here. > > An HP spectrum analyser close coupled to the line (common mode) shows this signal > level to reach at least 5 mV around 100 KHz. > > Tests on BT lines in other areas where broadband is also not installed show no RF > present other than broadcast stations etc. > > Can anyone say if such common mode RF levels on BT lines can be typical, or might be > expected where no broadband facilities are connected? Are levels I am finding here > regarded as acceptable? And does anyone know of any regulations, codes of practice > or technical standards on the subject? > > Howard G3RXH > > > > > > > >