Envelope-to: dave@picks.force9.co.uk Delivery-date: Wed, 18 May 2005 11:57:43 +0100 Received: from pih-spamcore03.plus.net ([192.168.71.7]) by pih-mxcore08.plus.net with esmtp (PlusNet MXCore v1.0) id 1DYMFD-0000Dm-Fx for dave@picks.force9.co.uk; Wed, 18 May 2005 11:57:43 +0100 Received: from Debian-exim by pih-spamcore03.plus.net with spam-scanned (Exim 4.50) id 1DYMFC-0003TB-Jn for dave@picks.force9.co.uk; Wed, 18 May 2005 11:57:43 +0100 Received: from [192.168.67.4] (helo=ptb-mxcore04.plus.net) by pih-spamcore03.plus.net with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1DYMFC-0003T8-Hb for dave@picks.force9.co.uk; Wed, 18 May 2005 11:57:42 +0100 Received: from post.thorcom.com ([193.82.116.20]) by ptb-mxcore04.plus.net with esmtp (PlusNet MXCore v1.0) id 1DYMJP-0007My-D2 for dave@picks.force9.co.uk; Wed, 18 May 2005 12:02:03 +0100 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1DYMEv-0004u3-Ew for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Wed, 18 May 2005 11:57:25 +0100 Received: from [193.82.116.30] (helo=relay.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1DYMEv-0004tu-1A for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 18 May 2005 11:57:25 +0100 Received: from mailfe10.swipnet.se ([212.247.155.33] helo=swip.net) by relay.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DYMEt-0005jA-Ha for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 18 May 2005 11:57:25 +0100 X-T2-Posting-ID: 3bgU4LVfFOB/SKpu7D1OzA== Received: from [212.151.11.26] ([212.151.11.26] verified) by mailfe10.swip.net (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.3c5) with ESMTP id 160830056 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 18 May 2005 12:57:16 +0200 Received: from 127.0.0.1 (AVG SMTP 7.0.308 [266.11.12]); Wed, 18 May 2005 10:57:29 +0000 Message-ID: <428B1F97.7040007@tele2.se> Date: Wed, 18 May 2005 10:57:27 +0000 From: Johan Bodin User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.2 (Windows/20050317) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <000c01c55b7c$8c384f20$14d0fc3e@l8p8y6> In-Reply-To: <000c01c55b7c$8c384f20$14d0fc3e@l8p8y6> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-SPF-Result: relay.thorcom.net: 212.247.155.33 is neither permitted nor denied by domain of tele2.se Subject: Re: LF: CLASS D/E Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-Spam-Filtered: by PlusNet SpamCORE (v4.00s) Mal wrote: > Hi All > Where would I find a good book about class D and E amp design including > the mathematics? Mal, regarding class E, the best paper I have ever seen is "Class-E RF Power Amplifiers" by Nathan O. Sokal, WA1HQC. The author is one of the inventors of class E. It was published in Jan/Feb QEX 2001. You will find it in .pdf format here: http://www.classeradio.com/sokal2corrected.pdf Another good source of information on class D/E/F switching amplifiers, with some math, can be found in the chapter "High Efficiency Power Amplifiers" in the book "Solid State Radio Engineering" by F. Raab et al. Class E has lower "transistor utilization factor" than class D so any given transistor will have less maximum output power in class E. However, class E has some great advantages. For example, The nasty (go-bang!) voltage spikes often seen in class D amplifiers does not exist in a properly designed class E amplifier! Another advantage is that the drive requirements are very relaxed compared to class D, especially current switching class D, because the majority of the current flows in the middle of the "ON period" of the class E transistor, very little near the on/off edges. Some HF designs even use sinusoidal drive with good results! In my opinion, Class E is smooth, simple, elegant and (literally) cool. There is a considerable amount of even harmonics in the output of a single ended class E stage, especially if the series resonant tank has relatively low Q. Instead of building a super-duper lowpass filter, you may wish to build a push-pull class E amplifier, where the even harmonics are cancelled by symmetry, and get away with a less elaborate lowpass filter. It is simple. Design a class E stage for half the desired output. Then build two such stages, each with separate DC feeding chokes and separate drain-source parallel capacitors. Drive the two stages with a 180-degree (push-pull) signal (50% duty cycle square wave) and let both stages share a common series tank and output transformer. Tank L = twice the L from the single stage design and tank C = design C / 2. Transformer primary input impedance = 2 * single stage design load impedance. The DC feeding choke(s) has to be quite large in order not to interfere with the (non-sinusoidal) waveform at the transistor drain/collector. In the "schoolbook example", the choke is there only to feed a constant DC current into the stage and the choke simply doesn't exist at RF frequencies... Values as high as XL = 30*XC of the drain/source capacitor has been mentioned but I think it is possible to get away with a somewhat smaller value. A nice program for class E design is available at http://tonnesoftware.com/ (Look for ClassE) A handful of IRFP450 at 80V supply voltage (or so) will deliver a respectable power (even in class E :-)... 73 Johan SM6LKM -- No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Anti-Virus. Version: 7.0.308 / Virus Database: 266.11.12 - Release Date: 2005-05-17