Envelope-to: dave@picks.force9.co.uk Delivery-date: Sat, 28 May 2005 17:24:02 +0100 Received: by ptb-mxcore02.plus.net with spam-scanned (PlusNet MXCore v2.00) id 1Dc46T-0005U4-LH for dave@picks.force9.co.uk; Sat, 28 May 2005 17:24:02 +0100 Received: from post.thorcom.com ([193.82.116.20]) by ptb-mxcore02.plus.net with esmtp (PlusNet MXCore v2.00) id 1Dc46T-0005RF-HH for dave@picks.force9.co.uk; Sat, 28 May 2005 17:24:01 +0100 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1Dc468-0000RY-5P for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Sat, 28 May 2005 17:23:40 +0100 Received: from [193.82.59.130] (helo=relay2.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1Dc467-0000RP-OV for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sat, 28 May 2005 17:23:39 +0100 Received: from smtp2.wanadoo.co.uk ([193.252.22.157] helo=smtp2.freeserve.com) by relay2.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.51) id 1Dc46X-0003LY-KB for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sat, 28 May 2005 17:24:09 +0100 Received: from me-wanadoo.net (mx1.fitmommies.com [127.0.0.1]) by mwinf3107.me.freeserve.com (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id 932644800083 for ; Sat, 28 May 2005 18:23:29 +0200 (CEST) Received: from wwinf3103 (wwinf3103 [172.22.158.30]) by mwinf3107.me.freeserve.com (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id 8817E4800082 for ; Sat, 28 May 2005 18:23:29 +0200 (CEST) X-ME-UUID: 20050528162329557.8817E4800082@mwinf3107.me.freeserve.com Message-ID: <23576722.1117297409547.JavaMail.www@wwinf3103> From: Lawrence Mayhead G3AQC To: RSGB Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Originating-IP: [86.131.67.112] Date: Sat, 28 May 2005 18:23:29 +0200 (CEST) Subject: LF: Racal RA1792 Content-Type: text/html; charset=windows-1252 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-PN-SpamFiltered: by PlusNet MXCore (v2.00) Content-transfer-encoding: 8bit

Hi Alberto.

I agree with Dave in general, but I find the 1792 very useful for QRSS etc it is very stable and the  Digital frequency selection and variable BFO offset are very useful. The price you quote is quite reasonable, the going rate here a year ago was £500. earlier even £1000. I use mine all the time, so far the display is fine.

73 Laurie.   



Whatever you Wanadoo

This email has been checked for most known viruses - find out more here