Envelope-to: dave@picks.force9.co.uk Delivery-date: Tue, 24 May 2005 23:40:17 +0100 Received: by ptb-mxcore01.plus.net with spam-scanned (PlusNet MXCore v2.00) id 1Dai4O-0001oK-Ru for dave@picks.force9.co.uk; Tue, 24 May 2005 23:40:17 +0100 Received: from post.thorcom.com ([193.82.116.20]) by ptb-mxcore01.plus.net with esmtp (PlusNet MXCore v2.00) id 1Dai4O-0001o3-Kl for dave@picks.force9.co.uk; Tue, 24 May 2005 23:40:16 +0100 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1Dai42-0007FR-Te for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Tue, 24 May 2005 23:39:54 +0100 Received: from [193.82.116.30] (helo=relay.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1Dai42-0007FI-IX for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Tue, 24 May 2005 23:39:54 +0100 Received: from imo-d23.mx.aol.com ([205.188.139.137]) by relay.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Dai41-0000ic-5E for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Tue, 24 May 2005 23:39:54 +0100 Received: from G4gvw@aol.com by imo-d23.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v38_r1.7.) id l.1ff.241ccfd (4262) for ; Tue, 24 May 2005 18:39:40 -0400 (EDT) From: G4gvw@aol.com Message-ID: <1ff.241ccfd.2fc5072c@aol.com> Date: Tue, 24 May 2005 18:39:40 EDT To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: 9.0 SE for Windows sub 5003 X-SPF-Result: relay.thorcom.net: domain of aol.com designates 205.188.139.137 as permitted sender Subject: Re: LF: reception with multiple antennas Content-Type: text/html; charset=windows-1252 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-PN-SpamFiltered: by PlusNet MXCore (v2.00) Content-transfer-encoding: 8bit

Hi All,

Would it not be better to use either ful AM or perhaps SSB for the links in order to retain the best possible dynamic range as my experience with cheap FM kit is the converse.

g4gvw