Envelope-to: dave@picks.force9.co.uk Delivery-date: Wed, 18 May 2005 19:20:19 +0100 Received: from pih-spamcore03.plus.net ([192.168.71.7]) by pih-mxcore06.plus.net with esmtp (PlusNet MXCore v1.0) id 1DYT9X-0000N3-H8 for dave@picks.force9.co.uk; Wed, 18 May 2005 19:20:19 +0100 Received: from Debian-exim by pih-spamcore03.plus.net with spam-scanned (Exim 4.50) id 1DYT9W-0006YQ-Pk for dave@picks.force9.co.uk; Wed, 18 May 2005 19:20:19 +0100 Received: from [192.168.101.76] (helo=pih-mxcore10.plus.net) by pih-spamcore03.plus.net with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1DYT9W-0006YN-Nn for dave@picks.force9.co.uk; Wed, 18 May 2005 19:20:18 +0100 Received: from post.thorcom.com ([193.82.116.20]) by pih-mxcore10.plus.net with esmtp (PlusNet MXCore v1.0) id 1DYT9W-0002Qv-Gv for dave@picks.force9.co.uk; Wed, 18 May 2005 19:20:18 +0100 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1DYT8x-0005hy-4M for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Wed, 18 May 2005 19:19:43 +0100 Received: from [193.82.116.30] (helo=relay.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1DYT8w-0005hp-LA for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 18 May 2005 19:19:42 +0100 Received: from pfepa.post.tele.dk ([195.41.46.235]) by relay.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DYT8v-00083d-1l for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 18 May 2005 19:19:42 +0100 Received: from preinstapdq0tf (0x50a46c54.virnxx14.adsl-dhcp.tele.dk [80.164.108.84]) by pfepa.post.tele.dk (Postfix) with SMTP id 7DD5747FECA for ; Wed, 18 May 2005 20:19:37 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <001301c55bd6$25063560$546ca450@preinstapdq0tf> From: "Niels Rudberg J?rgensen" To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <003a01c55baf$b26e3aa0$14d0fc3e@l8p8y6> Date: Wed, 18 May 2005 20:19:33 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1437 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1441 X-SPF-Result: relay.thorcom.net: domain of post.tele.dk designates 195.41.46.235 as permitted sender Subject: LF: Re: cores Content-Type: text/html; charset=windows-1252 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-Spam-Filtered: by PlusNet SpamCORE (v4.00s) Content-transfer-encoding: 8bit
 
----- Original Message -----
From: hamilton mal
To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Sent: Wednesday, May 18, 2005 3:43 PM
Subject: LF: cores

Hi All
Another anomaly about these ferrite transformers. I wound a 3c type core with a Sec of 24 turns and measured it to be 1.38 mh then over wound this with the prim of 8 turns, this reduced the Sec to 982 uh with a prim of 110 uh. The ratio is about right x9 for a 1:3 ratio. I suppose meaurements should only be made when the transformer is complete with all windings, but it does show the effects of multiple windings over a single layer.
Except one has a lot of test equipment it seems most dabblers are working in the dark especially at LF, no wonder there are so many BANGS especially the FETS!!!!!!!1
To guarantee a robust no bang amplifier maybe TUBES are still the best bet.
From messages received it appears to be that as long as the ratio Prim /Sec is correct the ferrite material is not important but then why such a variety of different core material, although I do realise that certain other ccts at HF work better with a particular core mix.
I could do with some design literature written by others that  have experience in the ferrite  transformer research field.
 73 de Mal/G3KEV
 
Hi Mal!
You do not tell how you measure inductance.
First, you can be absolutely sure that in a reasonably well designed transformer
(negligible leakage) the inductance ratio will always be equal to the square of the
turns ratio.
When it comes to measuring inductance, things are quite complicated. The
core permeability is not constant with frequency, but varies quite a bit. In ferrite
catalogues you will find a term called the complex permeability. The real
component of this term is what gives you inductance whereas the complex
component represents losses. Thus the inductance reading you find is dependent
e.g. on the test frequency of your inductance meter. In particular, if your test
frequency is high, you are really bad off!  With a high test frequency, winding
capacitances  may come into the picture, too.
A tip: Measure inductance with a test bridge at a low (much lower than 136 kHz)
frequency and make allowance for the complex permeability, -- or make your
measurement at 136 kHz (test set up: generator - inductance - variable resistor, 
meter and a 3-dB criterion).
73=
Niels/OZ8NJ+