Envelope-to: dave@picks.force9.co.uk Delivery-date: Wed, 27 Apr 2005 16:53:31 +0100 Received: from ptb-spamcore02.plus.net ([192.168.71.3]) by pih-mxcore11.plus.net with esmtp (PlusNet MXCore v1.0) id 1DQoqx-0003Ow-5K for dave@picks.force9.co.uk; Wed, 27 Apr 2005 16:53:31 +0100 Received: from mailnull by ptb-spamcore02.plus.net with spamcore-l-b (Exim 4.32; FreeBSD) id 1DQovX-000Hde-Kz for dave@picks.force9.co.uk; Wed, 27 Apr 2005 16:58:15 +0100 Received: from [192.168.101.75] (helo=pih-mxcore09.plus.net) by ptb-spamcore02.plus.net with esmtp (Exim 4.32; FreeBSD) id 1DQovX-000HdZ-Fd for dave@picks.force9.co.uk; Wed, 27 Apr 2005 16:58:15 +0100 Received: from post.thorcom.com ([193.82.116.20]) by pih-mxcore09.plus.net with esmtp (PlusNet MXCore v1.0) id 1DQoqw-0003wY-9U for dave@picks.force9.co.uk; Wed, 27 Apr 2005 16:53:30 +0100 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1DQoqm-0004tU-QX for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Wed, 27 Apr 2005 16:53:20 +0100 Received: from [193.82.116.30] (helo=relay.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1DQoqm-0004tL-E9 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 27 Apr 2005 16:53:20 +0100 Received: from smtp802.mail.ukl.yahoo.com ([217.12.12.139]) by relay.thorcom.net with smtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DQoqk-00077a-2n for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 27 Apr 2005 16:53:20 +0100 Received: from unknown (HELO Dell5150) (davepick@btinternet.com@217.43.204.36 with login) by smtp802.mail.ukl.yahoo.com with SMTP; 27 Apr 2005 15:53:12 -0000 From: "Dave Pick" To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Date: Wed, 27 Apr 2005 16:53:41 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook, Build 11.0.6353 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2180 Thread-Index: AcVLK2y+PAjkPbWIReymR462CEP2wgAFZjIg In-Reply-To: <000401c54b2c$f8d0e0d0$4d01a8c0@JKA> X-SPF-Result: relay.thorcom.net: 217.12.12.139 is neither permitted nor denied by domain of picks.force9.co.uk X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: autolearn=failed,none Message-Id: Subject: LF: RE: Re: RE: Re: Re: Wolf tests Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-Spam-Filtered: by PlusNet SpamCORE (v3.00) John and co. I'll run it overnight on 137.422 then at 300W or so. Let's hope conditions are still OK Dave G3YXM -----Original Message----- From: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org [mailto:owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org] On Behalf Of John Andrews Sent: 27 April 2005 14:28 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Subject: LF: Re: RE: Re: Re: Wolf tests Dave, > I'm willing to give it a try. > What frequency would be good for you? The 137.441 kHz frequency has generally worked well on both sides, though I chose it more for EU than North American reasons. 137.422 kHz is clear of Loran-C over a lot of the U.S., and might be the best choice for a TA experiment. John Andrews