Envelope-to: dave@picks.force9.co.uk Delivery-date: Wed, 27 Apr 2005 15:40:15 +0100 Received: from ptb-spamcore01.plus.net ([192.168.71.1]) by pih-mxcore10.plus.net with esmtp (PlusNet MXCore v1.0) id 1DQni2-0004bj-Sx for dave@picks.force9.co.uk; Wed, 27 Apr 2005 15:40:14 +0100 Received: from mailnull by ptb-spamcore01.plus.net with spamcore-l-b (Exim 4.32; FreeBSD) id 1DQnm6-000LKo-Us for dave@picks.force9.co.uk; Wed, 27 Apr 2005 15:44:26 +0100 Received: from [192.168.101.78] (helo=pih-mxcore12.plus.net) by ptb-spamcore01.plus.net with esmtp (Exim 4.32; FreeBSD) id 1DQnm6-000LKl-SF for dave@picks.force9.co.uk; Wed, 27 Apr 2005 15:44:26 +0100 Received: from post.thorcom.com ([193.82.116.20]) by pih-mxcore12.plus.net with esmtp (PlusNet MXCore v1.0) id 1DQni2-0001cA-4Z for dave@picks.force9.co.uk; Wed, 27 Apr 2005 15:40:14 +0100 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1DQnhW-0004bs-EA for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Wed, 27 Apr 2005 15:39:42 +0100 Received: from [193.82.116.30] (helo=relay.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1DQnhV-0004bj-Uw for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 27 Apr 2005 15:39:41 +0100 Received: from bay102-f39.bay102.hotmail.com ([64.4.61.49] helo=hotmail.com) by relay.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DQnhT-0006kT-Eo for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 27 Apr 2005 15:39:41 +0100 Received: from mail pickup service by hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC; Wed, 27 Apr 2005 07:39:33 -0700 Message-ID: Received: from 64.4.61.206 by by102fd.bay102.hotmail.msn.com with HTTP; Wed, 27 Apr 2005 14:39:32 GMT X-Originating-IP: [64.4.61.206] X-Originating-Email: [hellozerohellozero@hotmail.com] X-Sender: hellozerohellozero@hotmail.com From: "Laurence KL1X" To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Date: Wed, 27 Apr 2005 06:39:32 -0800 Mime-Version: 1.0 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 27 Apr 2005 14:39:33.0433 (UTC) FILETIME=[ED785290:01C54B36] X-SPF-Result: relay.thorcom.net: domain of hotmail.com designates 64.4.61.49 as permitted sender X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: autolearn=failed,MSGID_FROM_MTA_HEADER=0 Subject: LF: Wolf Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.8 required=5.0 tests=MSGID_FROM_MTA_HEADER autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-Spam-Filtered: by PlusNet SpamCORE (v3.00) Content-transfer-encoding: 8bit Any pointers of how well Wolf works co-channel wise? - here Im thinking of a Wolf Wateringhole where mutiple stations operate within a window - Not too sure how well it works with say three signals about the same (weak) strength within say 10hz - Im presuming we should stay say 15Hz separated given the spread of this mode? Here on my TS870 I set the Rx to SSB USB 137.000 and rx centre freq to 441Hz on the GUI for XES - I ran three windows of the GUI on my 700Mhz Thinkpad for XES and didnt have any issues so it looks like I could attempt receive more than one station at a time, certainly so far without crashing the device - This mode is pretty amazing in its ability to be received; my noiz level was a constant 20 over 9 last night with nasty lightning and increased "base" noiz - I had a lock on BIG WOLF John, who isnt exactly next door, within 288 secs. At the same time I ran multiple windows (Argo et al) of the Spectrum around Johns freq - I visually couldnt detect part of his spectrum at any speed! LAurence KL1X/5 em26aq