Return-Path: Received: (qmail 20674 invoked from network); 13 Apr 2005 13:22:26 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ptb-spamcore01.plus.net) (192.168.71.1) by ptb-mailstore01.plus.net with SMTP; 13 Apr 2005 13:22:26 -0000 Received: from mailnull by ptb-spamcore01.plus.net with spamcore-l-b (Exim 4.32; FreeBSD) id 1DLhr9-000CCF-Cy for dave@picks.force9.co.uk; Wed, 13 Apr 2005 14:24:35 +0100 Received: from [192.168.101.71] (helo=pih-mxcore05.plus.net) by ptb-spamcore01.plus.net with esmtp (Exim 4.32; FreeBSD) id 1DLhr9-000CCA-5D for dave@picks.force9.co.uk; Wed, 13 Apr 2005 14:24:35 +0100 Received: from post.thorcom.com ([193.82.116.20]) by pih-mxcore05.plus.net with esmtp (PlusNet MXCore v1.0) id 1DLhp3-0002Bo-IX for dave@picks.force9.co.uk; Wed, 13 Apr 2005 14:22:25 +0100 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1DLhok-0006ch-Mq for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Wed, 13 Apr 2005 14:22:06 +0100 Received: from [193.82.116.30] (helo=relay.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1DLhok-0006cY-At for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 13 Apr 2005 14:22:06 +0100 Received: from cmsout03.mbox.net ([165.212.64.33]) by relay.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DLhoi-0000m7-PC for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 13 Apr 2005 14:22:06 +0100 Received: from cmsout03.mbox.net (cmsout03.mbox.net [165.212.64.33]) by cmsout03.mbox.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 14D4AF8 for ; Wed, 13 Apr 2005 13:21:58 +0000 (GMT) Received: from uadvg131.cms.usa.net [165.212.11.131] by cmsout03.mbox.net via smtad (C8.MAIN.3.21U); Wed, 13 Apr 2005 13:21:58 GMT X-USANET-Source: 165.212.11.131 IN dibene@usa.net uadvg131.cms.usa.net X-USANET-MsgId: XID793JDmNV75533X03 Received: from [192.168.0.2] [151.46.39.147] by uadvg131.cms.usa.net (ASMTP/dibene@usa.net) via mtad (C8.MAIN.3.21E) with ESMTP id 318JDmNV40041M31; Wed, 13 Apr 2005 13:21:55 GMT X-USANET-Auth: 151.46.39.147 AUTH dibene@usa.net [192.168.0.2] Message-ID: <425D1CF9.4090207@usa.net> Date: Wed, 13 Apr 2005 15:22:01 +0200 From: Alberto di Bene User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (Windows/20041206) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 0.90.0.0 X-Enigmail-Supports: pgp-inline, pgp-mime Z-USANET-MsgId: XID318JDmNV50041X31 X-SPF-Result: relay.thorcom.net: 165.212.64.33 is neither permitted nor denied by domain of usa.net X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: autolearn=failed,none Subject: LF: Re: How to easily cross the Pond ? (was : G3AQC in ZL) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-Spam-Filtered: by PlusNet SpamCORE (v3.00) G0MRF@aol.com wrote: > I wonder if the new narrow version of JT65 would give us something to > play with. David, I am by no means an expert of JT65, but, as far as I know, its coding takes into account the structure of the call signs of the hams active in EME mode, using them as an alphabet of symbols to search into. Probably the excellent ideas behind JT65 could be used for a new program, but I doubt that JT65 can be used as it is.... but of course I may be proved wrong, as often happened... 73 Alberto I2PHD