Envelope-to: dave@picks.force9.co.uk Delivery-date: Fri, 29 Apr 2005 15:18:09 +0100 Received: from ptb-spamcore01.plus.net ([192.168.71.1]) by pih-mxcore07.plus.net with esmtp (PlusNet MXCore v1.0) id 1DRWJl-0004w4-7A for dave@picks.force9.co.uk; Fri, 29 Apr 2005 15:18:09 +0100 Received: from mailnull by ptb-spamcore01.plus.net with spamcore-l-b (Exim 4.32; FreeBSD) id 1DRWO6-000PPR-Cp for dave@picks.force9.co.uk; Fri, 29 Apr 2005 15:22:38 +0100 Received: from [192.168.101.75] (helo=pih-mxcore09.plus.net) by ptb-spamcore01.plus.net with esmtp (Exim 4.32; FreeBSD) id 1DRWO6-000PPO-AG for dave@picks.force9.co.uk; Fri, 29 Apr 2005 15:22:38 +0100 Received: from post.thorcom.com ([193.82.116.20]) by pih-mxcore09.plus.net with esmtp (PlusNet MXCore v1.0) id 1DRWJk-0006bn-DF for dave@picks.force9.co.uk; Fri, 29 Apr 2005 15:18:08 +0100 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1DRWJN-0003SS-Aa for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Fri, 29 Apr 2005 15:17:45 +0100 Received: from [193.82.116.30] (helo=relay.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1DRWJM-0003SJ-VA for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 29 Apr 2005 15:17:44 +0100 Received: from smtpout01-04.mesa1.secureserver.net ([64.202.165.79]) by relay.thorcom.net with smtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DRWJL-00012d-Cz for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 29 Apr 2005 15:17:44 +0100 Received: (qmail 28065 invoked from network); 29 Apr 2005 14:17:41 -0000 Received: from unknown (208.37.242.34) by smtpout01-04.mesa1.secureserver.net (64.202.165.79) with ESMTP; 29 Apr 2005 14:17:41 -0000 Message-ID: <001f01c54cc7$d3bd5250$8d01a8c0@JKA> From: "John Andrews" To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: Date: Fri, 29 Apr 2005 10:29:17 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1437 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1441 X-SPF-Result: relay.thorcom.net: 64.202.165.79 is neither permitted nor denied by domain of w1tag.com X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: autolearn=failed,none Subject: LF: Re: RE: Re: TA APR 28/29 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-Spam-Filtered: by PlusNet SpamCORE (v3.00) Dave, Your setup sounds fine, and the 0.020 Hz reading is close enough for any practical purpose. And you won't draw me into an argument about QSO's over multiple days! I should really have copied your signal in the following segment. The numbers all looked good, but no results. Back in the "good old days", I would have a .wav file, and would manipulate a bunch of parameters to coax out some copy. Not a very valuable technique for QSO's! I think we are better off just taking what comes out of the program as it's being run. The "f: 0.020" entries were frequent enough to convince me that it was seeing the signal regularly up to 0300 or so. Little useful info appeared after that. John Andrews