Envelope-to: dave@picks.force9.co.uk Delivery-date: Sun, 24 Apr 2005 19:16:24 +0100 Received: from pih-spamcore04.plus.net ([192.168.71.8]) by ptb-mxcore04.plus.net with esmtp (PlusNet MXCore v1.0) id 1DPlea-0005yW-Mo for dave@picks.force9.co.uk; Sun, 24 Apr 2005 19:16:24 +0100 Received: from Debian-exim by pih-spamcore04.plus.net with spam-scanned (Exim 4.50) id 1DPlbp-0005sC-DR for dave@picks.force9.co.uk; Sun, 24 Apr 2005 19:14:23 +0100 Received: from [192.168.101.72] (helo=pih-mxcore06.plus.net) by pih-spamcore04.plus.net with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1DPlbo-0005s4-Bl for dave@picks.force9.co.uk; Sun, 24 Apr 2005 19:13:32 +0100 Received: from post.thorcom.com ([193.82.116.20]) by pih-mxcore06.plus.net with esmtp (PlusNet MXCore v1.0) id 1DPlbo-0003Po-5n for dave@picks.force9.co.uk; Sun, 24 Apr 2005 19:13:32 +0100 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1DPlbl-0005CG-0U for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Sun, 24 Apr 2005 19:13:29 +0100 Received: from [193.82.116.30] (helo=relay.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1DPlbk-0005C7-Jb for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 24 Apr 2005 19:13:28 +0100 Received: from fh1023.dia.cp.net ([64.97.168.33] helo=n066.sc1.cp.net) by relay.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DPlbj-0007kH-4w for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 24 Apr 2005 19:13:28 +0100 Received: from l8p8y6 (62.252.233.24) by n066.sc1.cp.net (7.0.043) id 42437A00005FB7F7 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 24 Apr 2005 18:13:21 +0000 Message-ID: <000c01c548ef$b7628d40$18e9fc3e@l8p8y6> From: "hamilton mal" To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Date: Sun, 24 Apr 2005 18:04:10 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4807.1700 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4807.1700 X-SPF-Result: relay.thorcom.net: 64.97.168.33 is neither permitted nor denied by domain of virgin.net Subject: LF: LF ACTY Content-Type: text/html; charset=windows-1252 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-Spam-Filtered: by PlusNet SpamCORE (v4.00s) Content-transfer-encoding: 8bit
Hi All
I have been vy active this past month both on CW and QRS 1 to 3 with good results. Have been testing a new PA on both 135.922 khz approx for ZL acty at QRS 120 but faster at QRS 1-3 on 137.7 khz approx. I have been getting solid O copy at both QRS 1 and 2 to speed thing up around EU.
Tnx to all those that called and made a QSO and all the reports both on email, snailmail and LL. It appears there is a lot of listeners on LF.
I have gone from low voltage high current to high voltage and low current and both situations are different, apart from suitable FETS for the change other components also had to be changed for stability purposes. The high current devices seem more stable than the high voltage approach.
With the change and the antenna system here I expected to be seen in ZL if propagation was half favourable.
73 de Mal/G3KEV