Return-Path: Received: (qmail 47065 invoked from network); 29 Mar 2005 13:29:23 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ptb-spamcore01.plus.net) (192.168.71.1) by ptb-mailstore03.plus.net with SMTP; 29 Mar 2005 13:29:23 -0000 Received: from mailnull by ptb-spamcore01.plus.net with spamcore-l-b (Exim 4.32; FreeBSD) id 1DGGqI-0007ST-CO for dave@picks.force9.co.uk; Tue, 29 Mar 2005 14:33:52 +0100 Received: from [192.168.67.2] (helo=ptb-mxcore02.plus.net) by ptb-spamcore01.plus.net with esmtp (Exim 4.32; FreeBSD) id 1DGGmr-0004K5-2L for dave@picks.force9.co.uk; Tue, 29 Mar 2005 14:29:55 +0100 Received: from post.thorcom.com ([193.82.116.20]) by ptb-mxcore02.plus.net with esmtp (Exim) id 1DGG5Q-000Gyo-HR for dave@picks.force9.co.uk; Tue, 29 Mar 2005 12:44:48 +0000 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1DGG53-0003wi-F7 for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Tue, 29 Mar 2005 13:44:25 +0100 Received: from [193.82.116.30] (helo=relay.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1DGG53-0003wZ-2k for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Tue, 29 Mar 2005 13:44:25 +0100 Received: from smtp.wp.pl ([212.77.101.1]) by relay.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DGG4z-0005Yq-KK for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Tue, 29 Mar 2005 13:44:25 +0100 Received: (wp-smtpd smtp.wp.pl 7299 invoked from network); 29 Mar 2005 14:44:15 +0200 Received: from miglanc.socrates.org.pl (HELO [192.168.1.39]) (sq5bpm@[194.181.189.2]) (envelope-sender ) by smtp.wp.pl (WP-SMTPD) with AES256-SHA encrypted SMTP for ; 29 Mar 2005 14:44:15 +0200 Message-ID: <42494D98.8060506@wp.pl> Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2005 14:44:08 +0200 From: Marek SQ5BPM User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (Windows/20041206) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <001301c533a6$e3f37c60$2102000a@ibm> <004701c533c7$5f9b2a00$546ca450@preinstapdq0tf> <000801c533ce$756d3ce0$2102000a@ibm> In-Reply-To: <000801c533ce$756d3ce0$2102000a@ibm> X-WP-AV: skaner antywirusowy poczty Wirtualnej Polski S. A. X-WP-SPAM: NO AS1=NO(Body=1 Fuz1=1 Fuz2=1) AS2=YES(0.999995) AS3=NO AS4=NO X-SPF-Result: relay.thorcom.net: domain of wp.pl designates 212.77.101.1 as permitted sender X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: autolearn=failed,none Subject: LF: More on cores... Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-Spam-Filtered: by PlusNet SpamCORE (v3.00) Hello all, I noticed that people are using much more turns than me in the output transformer, so I would appreciate any help in calculating the correct number of turns for the cores I am using here. Messing around the trafo would probably allow me to achieve more power than now (450W). Trying to go higher causes heavy ringing + FET heating. I've tried almost everything to reduce this (different combinations of Zobel network, decoupling, inductances in series with gates, screening, grounding etc.). In every case around 400W things start to go bad, 450W is a border of manageable heat and ringing. I am thinking about making a new FET driver in a way that allows regulation of the time of the FET on-state, leaving some rest period in-between. Here are some details about my configuration: the power supply is 45V, dropping to 38-39V at around 12A (depending on the 230V mains voltage). I am using two R40/24/16 rings made of K2006 material, stuck together, for detailed info see http://www.kaschke.de/english/framesets/frame_ringkerne.html . After experimenting with different configurations, currently there's 2+2 turns in the primary winding, 5 or 6 turns in the secondary winding. I remember that 4+4 primary didn't work good, but this was just a short try with low power - maybe there's a way to make this work with that as well. Cores are slightly warm but never get hot. The power supply is driven through a coil made of a single core (the same type), consisting of 5 turns. This one gets hot only when there's too much ringing in the PA. Adjusting turns in this one does not change a lot. Thanks in advance for any help, I hope to make the TX again from scratch this summer: bigger, better & more powerful ;) 73! Marek SQ5BPM P.S. Don't be surprised seeing another special callsign on LF, these days we are celebrating 25-th anniversary of the SP5ZCC Scouts Amateur Radio Club. I am planning some LF operation with this call on April 9-10th. For the time being, I hope to see some of you in the SP DX Contest CW/SSB on April 2nd-3rd (HF). Check http://www.contest.spdxc.org.pl/en/index.php for more information.