Return-Path: Received: (qmail 54038 invoked from network); 5 Mar 2005 18:19:18 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ptb-spamcore01.plus.net) (192.168.71.1) by ptb-mailstore04.plus.net with SMTP; 5 Mar 2005 18:19:18 -0000 Received: from mailnull by ptb-spamcore01.plus.net with spamcore-l-b (Exim 4.32; FreeBSD) id 1D7du6-0006m6-Vl for dave@picks.force9.co.uk; Sat, 05 Mar 2005 18:21:32 +0000 Received: from [192.168.67.1] (helo=ptb-mxcore01.plus.net) by ptb-spamcore01.plus.net with esmtp (Exim 4.32; FreeBSD) id 1D7du6-0006m2-PT for dave@picks.force9.co.uk; Sat, 05 Mar 2005 18:21:30 +0000 Received: from post.thorcom.com ([193.82.116.20]) by ptb-mxcore01.plus.net with esmtp (Exim) id 1D7duF-0006MA-F1 for dave@picks.force9.co.uk; Sat, 05 Mar 2005 18:21:39 +0000 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1D7drl-0003ac-84 for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Sat, 05 Mar 2005 18:19:05 +0000 Received: from [193.82.116.30] (helo=relay.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1D7drk-0003aT-SE for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sat, 05 Mar 2005 18:19:04 +0000 Received: from cmsout03.mbox.net ([165.212.64.33]) by relay.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1D7drj-0003o5-8n for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sat, 05 Mar 2005 18:19:04 +0000 Received: from cmsout03.mbox.net (cmsout03.mbox.net [165.212.64.33]) by cmsout03.mbox.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id C2DA59C for ; Sat, 5 Mar 2005 18:18:55 +0000 (GMT) Received: from uadvg130.cms.usa.net [165.212.11.130] by cmsout03.mbox.net via smtad (C8.MAIN.3.21U); Sat, 05 Mar 2005 18:18:55 GMT X-USANET-Source: 165.212.11.130 IN dibene@usa.net uadvg130.cms.usa.net X-USANET-MsgId: XID579Jcess46448X03 Received: from [192.168.0.2] [151.41.144.235] by uadvg130.cms.usa.net (ASMTP/dibene@usa.net) via mtad (C8.MAIN.3.21E) with ESMTP id 963Jcess30222M30; Sat, 05 Mar 2005 18:18:54 GMT X-USANET-Auth: 151.41.144.235 AUTH dibene@usa.net [192.168.0.2] Message-ID: <4229F814.8060202@usa.net> Date: Sat, 05 Mar 2005 19:19:00 +0100 From: Alberto di Bene User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (Windows/20041206) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <4229F14D.12369.DB4AB1@localhost> In-Reply-To: <4229F14D.12369.DB4AB1@localhost> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.89.5.0 X-Enigmail-Supports: pgp-inline, pgp-mime Z-USANET-MsgId: XID963Jcess40222X30 X-SPF-Result: relay.thorcom.net: 165.212.64.33 is neither permitted nor denied by domain of usa.net X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: autolearn=failed,none Subject: LF: Re: Slow mode comparisons Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-Spam-Filtered: by PlusNet SpamCORE (v3.00) Mike, going from QRSS3 to QRSS10, when using Argo, means that the FFT bin size is 4 times smaller, and this results in an increase of 6 dB of SNR, provided the useful signal is still confined into a single bin. If you are in "experimentation mode", you could also arrange a comparison between QRSSxx and Jason at various speed. That could be interesting. 73 Alberto I2PHD --------------------------------- Mike Dennison wrote: >This morning, I worked a new station for me (No:103), DL3ZID. He >first called me on DFCW3, but was impossible to read. He then changed >to QRSS3 which was an improvement, but not 100%. A change to QRSS10 >gave a really clear easy-to-read signal. > >