Return-Path: Received: (qmail 64904 invoked from network); 2 Mar 2005 14:19:51 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ptb-spamcore01.plus.net) (192.168.71.1) by ptb-mailstore02.plus.net with SMTP; 2 Mar 2005 14:19:51 -0000 Received: from mailnull by ptb-spamcore01.plus.net with spamcore-l-b (Exim 4.32; FreeBSD) id 1D6UhF-0003bL-J4 for dave@picks.force9.co.uk; Wed, 02 Mar 2005 14:20:10 +0000 Received: from [192.168.67.1] (helo=ptb-mxcore01.plus.net) by ptb-spamcore01.plus.net with esmtp (Exim 4.32; FreeBSD) id 1D6UgP-0003AN-Md for dave@picks.force9.co.uk; Wed, 02 Mar 2005 14:18:41 +0000 Received: from post.thorcom.com ([193.82.116.20]) by ptb-mxcore01.plus.net with esmtp (Exim) id 1D6Ugl-0008HR-BD for dave@picks.force9.co.uk; Wed, 02 Mar 2005 14:18:59 +0000 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1D6Udc-0000Ew-PN for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Wed, 02 Mar 2005 14:15:44 +0000 Received: from [193.82.116.30] (helo=relay.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1D6Udc-0000Eh-AJ for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 02 Mar 2005 14:15:44 +0000 Received: from smtpout17.mailhost.ntl.com ([212.250.162.17] helo=mta09-winn.mailhost.ntl.com) by relay.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1D6UdZ-0000AX-QK for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 02 Mar 2005 14:15:44 +0000 Received: from aamta01-winn.mailhost.ntl.com ([212.250.162.8]) by mta09-winn.mailhost.ntl.com with ESMTP id <20050302141536.VWMD29900.mta09-winn.mailhost.ntl.com@aamta01-winn.mailhost.ntl.com> for ; Wed, 2 Mar 2005 14:15:36 +0000 Received: from mikedennison ([80.4.116.83]) by aamta01-winn.mailhost.ntl.com with ESMTP id <20050302141536.PZIB1187.aamta01-winn.mailhost.ntl.com@mikedennison> for ; Wed, 2 Mar 2005 14:15:36 +0000 From: "Mike Dennison" To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Date: Wed, 02 Mar 2005 14:15:27 -0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-ID: <4225CA7F.15619.BBCBA7@localhost> X-mailer: Pegasus Mail for Windows (4.21c) Content-description: Mail message body X-SPF-Result: relay.thorcom.net: domain of ntlworld.com designates 212.250.162.17 as permitted sender X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: autolearn=failed,none Subject: LF: Lost current in a coil Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Content-transfer-encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-Spam-Filtered: by PlusNet SpamCORE (v3.00) A useful test to see whether radiation causes the loss, would be to completely screen the loading coil. I have never understood why, if the current is thought to stay the same from top to bottom of a coil, the voltage is much bigger at the top? Is this a phase thing? Mike, G3XDV =========== http://lf.apersonalguide.co.uk