Message-ID: <000701c51e4d$a0b41a40$0201a8c0@private.network>
From: "Scott Tilley" <sthed475@telus.net>
To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
References: <003e01c51e2b$0f93d220$0201a8c0@private.network> <001c01c51e4c$569cedc0$6507a8c0@Main>
Date: Tue, 1 Mar 2005 02:58:39 -0800
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: LF: Re: Re: ... --- ...
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org

Hey Alan

We got the bugs out...  Once I found the problem with the lack of sinc in
the 4013 divider stages things have been working as expected.  I thought
about the inductor coupling; however, based on my observations the combiner
is not doing anything negative to the signal train.  We still have >80% eff.

I would like to try this with toroids next and compact it down.  I'm also
dreaming up a bigger badder amp using this concept.  It seems real stable
and doesn't require running the system 'balls to the wall' to get some
serious power from 4 FET and a reasonable PSU voltage.

73 Scott

----- Original Message -----
From: "Alan Melia" <Alan.Melia@btinternet.com>
To: <rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org>
Sent: Tuesday, March 01, 2005 2:49 AM
Subject: LF: Re: ... --- ...


> Hi Steve I have just had a thought your construction looks fine....BUT
maybe
> the two coils are too close together and there is some coupling. I wonder
if
> it is possible to temporarily turn one at right angles to kill any
coupling
> and see if that helps??
> The biggies in my Web page were made with big toroids I believe probably
> iron dust rather than ferrite, as the inductance reqquired is not that
high
>
> Cheers de Alan G3NYK
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Scott Tilley" <sthed475@telus.net>
> To: <lowfer@lwca.org>; <rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org>
> Sent: 01 March 2005 06:51
> Subject: LF: ... --- ...
>
>
> The smoke test of this Wilkinson Combiner was successfull in that no smoke
> came out and nothing died.  However, we get enough heat to cook an egg on
> the 100ohm balance resistor.
>
> We have a scope match on the output to the dummy load and it shows about
> 225W from one transmitter, add another and we get 450W, success NOPE!  The
> transmitters are outputting ~450W each! Therefore, half the power is being
> absorbed in the 100ohm balance resistor.  Examining the phase relationship
> of the input to the combiner waveforms indicates they are in phase within
> ~10degrees and almost equal in amplitude.  So what gives!  Anyone have
some
> idea what may be going wrong?  Of course we have checked and doubled
checked
> the circuit for errors and nothing...  All seems as it should according to
> formulas and drawings we have viewed and designed it from.
>
> Does anyone have an idea how we could troubleshoot our way through this?
>
> Any advice would be appreciated.
>
> 73 Scott and Steve(It's all his fault ;-)
>
>
> Check the status of radio beacon 'TIL'  in CN89lg at:
> www.scottboxx.com/radio
>
>
>
>