Return-Path: Received: (qmail 57197 invoked from network); 29 Mar 2005 14:54:45 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ptb-spamcore01.plus.net) (192.168.71.1) by ptb-mailstore03.plus.net with SMTP; 29 Mar 2005 14:54:45 -0000 Received: from mailnull by ptb-spamcore01.plus.net with spamcore-l-b (Exim 4.32; FreeBSD) id 1DGIAF-0005L3-9a for dave@picks.force9.co.uk; Tue, 29 Mar 2005 15:58:28 +0100 Received: from [192.168.67.2] (helo=ptb-mxcore02.plus.net) by ptb-spamcore01.plus.net with esmtp (Exim 4.32; FreeBSD) id 1DGI7F-0002yp-LI for dave@picks.force9.co.uk; Tue, 29 Mar 2005 15:55:03 +0100 Received: from post.thorcom.com ([193.82.116.20]) by ptb-mxcore02.plus.net with esmtp (Exim) id 1DGHQ1-000C9Z-Tb for dave@picks.force9.co.uk; Tue, 29 Mar 2005 14:10:09 +0000 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1DGHPX-000494-EL for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Tue, 29 Mar 2005 15:09:39 +0100 Received: from [193.82.116.30] (helo=relay.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1DGHPW-00048v-Vf for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Tue, 29 Mar 2005 15:09:38 +0100 Received: from one.surfree.co.uk ([195.80.0.234]) by relay.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DGHPU-00060O-CA for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Tue, 29 Mar 2005 15:09:38 +0100 Received: from standalone ([212.248.140.4]) by one.surfree.co.uk (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id QAA21929 for ; Tue, 29 Mar 2005 16:10:01 +0100 Message-ID: <000401c53468$9c18eed0$048cf8d4@standalone> From: "Andy" To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2005 15:06:44 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 4.72.3110.5 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.3110.3 X-SPF-Result: relay.thorcom.net: 195.80.0.234 is neither permitted nor denied by domain of southsurf.com X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: autolearn=failed,none Subject: LF: Re: More on cores... Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-Spam-Filtered: by PlusNet SpamCORE (v3.00) For a sinusoidal waveform, the minimum number of turns on a core is given by : V(rms) = 4.44. F . N . A . B where V is the voltage across the winding F is the frequency in Hz A is the core cross sectional area in m^2 B is the peak flux in Teslas To avoid excessive dissipation, for modern ferrites if you keep B to a value of 0.2T or less you will be OK. As an example, for a core of 15mm diameter (approximately an ETD49 core) used in a 700 Watt PA the 50 ohms winding is calculated as follows : V = SQRT(700 * 50) = 187V(rms) This corresponds to a cross sectional area of 177mm^2, or A = 177*10^-6 m^2 V = 187, F = 137000, B = 0.2, A = 177E-6 N(min) = 187 / (4.44 * 137000 * 177E-6 * 0.2) = 8.7 Turns Taking to the nearest integer above, you will at least need 9 turns for this winding. You could use more turns to get B even lower, but now the copper losses begin to increase as the wire length rises so adding a couple of turns to get B even lower is the most you really need to do, so 10 to 11 turns is about right for this core. Note that the type of ferrite is not important, all transformer ferrites saturate as you get near 0.3T, althoug h modern ones MAY allow a bit higher. This equation seems to suggest that any size of core is acceptable for any voltage provided enough turns are used, and in a way this is true, but getting higher power through the core needs larger cross-sectional area. The calculations here are more involved, and it is easiest to resort to the data sheets and look at what the manufacturer claims is the maximum rating for any particular core. As a guide line, on my switchmode PA that generated RF direct from 340 Volt rectified mains (see QEX November/Dec 2002) I found an ETD49 sized core using 3C85 material would happily carry 700 Watts with B kept to below 0.18T. The primary winding operating at 29 ohms load impedance was made with 3mm diameter plastic covered Litz wire, and the secondary winding for matching into 50 to 150 ohms antenna resistance from 1mm diameter enamelled wire. At 700 W continuous operation for several hours in UK summer temperatures, the transformer core sat around 60 - 70 degrees - comfortably within its rating Andy G4JNT -----Original Message----- From: Marek SQ5BPM To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Date: 2005/03/29 14:46 Subject: LF: More on cores... >Hello all, > >I noticed that people are using much more turns than me in the output >transformer, so I would appreciate any help in calculating the correct >number of turns for the cores I am using here. Messing around the trafo >would probably allow me to achieve more power than now (450W). Trying to >go higher causes heavy ringing + FET heating. I've tried almost >everything to reduce this (different combinations of Zobel network, >decoupling, inductances in series with gates, screening, grounding >etc.). In every case around 400W things start to go bad, 450W is a >border of manageable heat and ringing. I am thinking about making a new >FET driver in a way that allows regulation of the time of the FET >on-state, leaving some rest period in-between. > >Here are some details about my configuration: the power supply is 45V, >dropping to 38-39V at around 12A (depending on the 230V mains voltage). >I am using two R40/24/16 rings made of K2006 material, stuck together, >for detailed info see >http://www.kaschke.de/english/framesets/frame_ringkerne.html . After >experimenting with different configurations, currently there's 2+2 turns >in the primary winding, 5 or 6 turns in the secondary winding. I >remember that 4+4 primary didn't work good, but this was just a short >try with low power - maybe there's a way to make this work with that as >well. Cores are slightly warm but never get hot. The power supply is >driven through a coil made of a single core (the same type), consisting >of 5 turns. This one gets hot only when there's too much ringing in the >PA. Adjusting turns in this one does not change a lot. > >Thanks in advance for any help, I hope to make the TX again from scratch >this summer: bigger, better & more powerful ;) > >73! Marek SQ5BPM > >P.S. Don't be surprised seeing another special callsign on LF, these >days we are celebrating 25-th anniversary of the SP5ZCC Scouts Amateur >Radio Club. I am planning some LF operation with this call on April >9-10th. For the time being, I hope to see some of you in the SP DX >Contest CW/SSB on April 2nd-3rd (HF). Check >http://www.contest.spdxc.org.pl/en/index.php for more information. >