Return-Path: Received: (qmail 19936 invoked from network); 25 Feb 2005 04:57:58 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ptb-spamcore01.plus.net) (192.168.71.1) by ptb-mailstore04.plus.net with SMTP; 25 Feb 2005 04:57:58 -0000 Received: from mailnull by ptb-spamcore01.plus.net with spamcore-l-b (Exim 4.32; FreeBSD) id 1D4XZ3-000LdR-63 for dave@picks.force9.co.uk; Fri, 25 Feb 2005 04:58:58 +0000 Received: from [192.168.67.3] (helo=ptb-mxcore03.plus.net) by ptb-spamcore01.plus.net with esmtp (Exim 4.32; FreeBSD) id 1D4XZ3-000LdO-2t for dave@picks.force9.co.uk; Fri, 25 Feb 2005 04:58:57 +0000 Received: from post.thorcom.com ([193.82.116.20]) by ptb-mxcore03.plus.net with esmtp (Exim) id 1D4XZa-0007aV-E6 for dave@picks.force9.co.uk; Fri, 25 Feb 2005 04:59:30 +0000 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1D4XXQ-0003D2-00 for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Fri, 25 Feb 2005 04:57:16 +0000 Received: from [193.82.116.30] (helo=relay.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1D4XXP-0003Ch-CW for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 25 Feb 2005 04:57:15 +0000 Received: from relay.sotline.ru ([80.89.139.226]) by relay.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1D4XXM-00083r-6g for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 25 Feb 2005 04:57:15 +0000 Received: from astral.omskcity.com (mxs.sotline.ru [80.89.139.227]) by relay.sotline.ru (8.x.x) with ESMTP id j1P4vB5r023965 for ; Fri, 25 Feb 2005 10:57:11 +0600 (OMST) (envelope-from fitec@omskcity.com) Received: from noname.nodomain.nowhere (host198.m02.dial.sotline.ru [81.176.51.198]) by astral.omskcity.com (8.x.x) with ESMTP id j1P4v9qY005320 for ; Fri, 25 Feb 2005 10:57:10 +0600 (OS) Received: from localhost (fitec@localhost) by noname.nodomain.nowhere (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id LAA00276 for ; Fri, 25 Feb 2005 11:16:47 GMT X-Authentication-Warning: noname.nodomain.nowhere: fitec owned process doing -bs Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2005 11:16:47 +0000 (GMT) From: "Alexander S. Yurkov" To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SPF-Result: relay.thorcom.net: domain of omskcity.com designates 80.89.139.226 as permitted sender X-Spam-Score: 1.3 (+) X-Spam-Report: autolearn=no,DATE_IN_FUTURE_06_12=1.202,FORGED_RCVD_HELO=0.05 Subject: Re: LF: Re: How many bits ? (was :Off Topic Ft101zd) Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.9 required=5.0 tests=DATE_IN_FUTURE_06_12 autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-Spam-Filtered: by PlusNet SpamCORE (v3.00) Content-transfer-encoding: 8bit It is worth to add: On Fri, 25 Feb 2005, Alexander S. Yurkov wrote: > bandwidth digital filter as You need. Then noise dithering an > quantisation noise deposit to out sig can be as small as is needed. If CPU > is powerfull enough of cose. And if clock is ideal also. 73 de RA9MB/Alex http://www.qsl.net/ra9mb