Return-Path: Received: (qmail 83791 invoked from network); 24 Feb 2005 00:34:31 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ptb-spamcore01.plus.net) (192.168.71.1) by ptb-mailstore01.plus.net with SMTP; 24 Feb 2005 00:34:31 -0000 Received: from mailnull by ptb-spamcore01.plus.net with spamcore-l-b (Exim 4.32; FreeBSD) id 1D46yO-000Nr4-IZ for dave@picks.force9.co.uk; Thu, 24 Feb 2005 00:35:21 +0000 Received: from [192.168.67.1] (helo=ptb-mxcore01.plus.net) by ptb-spamcore01.plus.net with esmtp (Exim 4.32; FreeBSD) id 1D46yO-000Nr1-FW for dave@picks.force9.co.uk; Thu, 24 Feb 2005 00:35:20 +0000 Received: from post.thorcom.com ([193.82.116.20]) by ptb-mxcore01.plus.net with esmtp (Exim) id 1D46zQ-0002do-Ni for dave@picks.force9.co.uk; Thu, 24 Feb 2005 00:36:24 +0000 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1D46wM-00072g-Vz for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Thu, 24 Feb 2005 00:33:14 +0000 Received: from [193.82.116.30] (helo=relay.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1D46wM-00072X-J3 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 24 Feb 2005 00:33:14 +0000 Received: from cmsout02.mbox.net ([165.212.64.32]) by relay.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1D46wJ-0008Is-Vv for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 24 Feb 2005 00:33:14 +0000 Received: from cmsout02.mbox.net (cmsout02.mbox.net [165.212.64.32]) by cmsout02.mbox.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id F0EA64C999 for ; Thu, 24 Feb 2005 00:33:02 +0000 (GMT) Received: from cmsapps01.cms.usa.net [165.212.11.136] by cmsout02.mbox.net via smtad (C8.MAIN.3.21U); Thu, 24 Feb 2005 00:33:03 GMT X-USANET-Source: 165.212.11.136 IN dibene@usa.net cmsapps01.cms.usa.net X-USANET-MsgId: XID033JBXahD1321X02 Received: from [192.168.0.2] [151.41.155.15] by cmsapps01.cms.usa.net (ASMTP/dibene@usa.net) via mtad (C8.MAIN.3.21E) with ESMTP id 593JBXaha0396M36; Thu, 24 Feb 2005 00:33:00 GMT X-USANET-Auth: 151.41.155.15 AUTH dibene@usa.net [192.168.0.2] Message-ID: <421D20BA.7090108@usa.net> Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2005 01:32:58 +0100 From: Alberto di Bene User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (Windows/20041206) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 0.89.5.0 X-Enigmail-Supports: pgp-inline, pgp-mime Z-USANET-MsgId: XID593JBXahB0396X36 X-SPF-Result: relay.thorcom.net: 165.212.64.32 is neither permitted nor denied by domain of usa.net X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: autolearn=failed,none Subject: LF: Re: Off Topic Ft101zd Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-Spam-Filtered: by PlusNet SpamCORE (v3.00) Alexander S. Yurkov wrote: >Why one need 24-bit? Though 16 bit is adequate for most SW,MW,LW recievers. >16 bit yelds abt 90 dB dynamic range (every bit exept sign bit yelds 6dB). >But this is dynamic range if there is no filtering. When you make banwidth >narrow by DSP then dynamic range will be improved because noise decreases. >If frontend sampling rate is, say 100 MHz (there is such an ADC) and >bandwidth of DSP filter is about, say 10 kHz this yelds 40 dB of noise >decreasing. Thus RX dynamic range to be about 90+40=130 dB! >[...] > > Alex, I am not quite sure I do agree with you. While it is true that narrowing the bandwidth the energy of the noise inside that bandwidth do decrease while the signal doesn't (provided it is entirely confined into that bandwidth), the problem is another, namely dynamic range. You need a great dynamic range to dig out a faint CW (or SSB) signal near a much stronger one, when both are inside the preselector filter bandpass. AGC is of no help here. A good receiver needs ideally at least 100 dB (better more) of so-called spurious-free DR And a 16-bit ADC running at tens of MHz I bet doesn't offer more than 14 bits of useable amplitude resolution, which translates into about 84 dB dynamic range. If the problem were only that of a good SNR, then your solution would work, but here what is needed is the capability to receive a 0.1 uV signal near to a broadcast station with 1V signal at the input of your receiver.... 73 Alberto I2PHD