Return-Path: Received: (qmail 82120 invoked from network); 27 Jan 2005 19:26:47 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ptb-spamcore01.plus.net) (192.168.71.1) by ptb-mailstore01.plus.net with SMTP; 27 Jan 2005 19:26:47 -0000 Received: from mailnull by ptb-spamcore01.plus.net with spamcore-l-b (Exim 4.32; FreeBSD) id 1CuFHO-000D2N-O9 for dave@picks.force9.co.uk; Thu, 27 Jan 2005 19:26:11 +0000 Received: from [192.168.67.2] (helo=ptb-mxcore02.plus.net) by ptb-spamcore01.plus.net with esmtp (Exim 4.32; FreeBSD) id 1CuFHO-000D2K-LW for dave@picks.force9.co.uk; Thu, 27 Jan 2005 19:26:10 +0000 Received: from post.thorcom.com ([193.82.116.20]) by ptb-mxcore02.plus.net with esmtp (Exim) id 1CuFHy-000OSL-NC for dave@picks.force9.co.uk; Thu, 27 Jan 2005 19:26:46 +0000 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1CuFGp-0008FJ-QM for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Thu, 27 Jan 2005 19:25:35 +0000 Received: from [193.82.116.30] (helo=relay.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1CuFGp-0008FA-Es for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 27 Jan 2005 19:25:35 +0000 Received: from relay.sotline.ru ([80.89.139.226]) by relay.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1CuFGl-0001Ql-R5 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 27 Jan 2005 19:25:35 +0000 Received: from astral.omskcity.com (mxs.sotline.ru [80.89.139.227]) by relay.sotline.ru (8.12.8p2/8.12.8) with ESMTP id j0RJPUeg005464 for ; Fri, 28 Jan 2005 01:25:31 +0600 (OMST) (envelope-from fitec@omskcity.com) Received: from noname.nodomain.nowhere (host198.m02.dial.sotline.ru [81.176.51.198]) by astral.omskcity.com (8.x.x) with ESMTP id j0RJPNMO023216 for ; Fri, 28 Jan 2005 01:25:29 +0600 (OS) Received: from localhost (fitec@localhost) by noname.nodomain.nowhere (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id BAA00264 for ; Fri, 28 Jan 2005 01:38:42 GMT X-Authentication-Warning: noname.nodomain.nowhere: fitec owned process doing -bs Date: Fri, 28 Jan 2005 01:38:41 +0000 (GMT) From: "Alexander S. Yurkov" To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org In-Reply-To: <6d.3d9cc472.2f2a7ce2@aol.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SPF-Result: relay.thorcom.net: domain of omskcity.com designates 80.89.139.226 as permitted sender X-Spam-Score: 0.1 (/) X-Spam-Report: autolearn=failed,FORGED_RCVD_HELO=0.05 Subject: Re: LF: Signals for RA9MB Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-Spam-Filtered: by PlusNet SpamCORE (v3.00) Content-transfer-encoding: 8bit On Thu, 27 Jan 2005 MarkusVester@aol.com wrote: > > Trying to add in another signal for you, I am planning to beacon in QRSS 60 > mode from 17:30 today on 137715.0, exactly 5 Hz above Gus. Oh, Markus, not tonight! I have not sleep 3 nights :-) May be ysterday or few days later... Local time is 01-00 (GMT+6). > I am not quite sure about the time and frequency scales of your waterfall > screenshots. I understand your FFT has 0.13 Hz resolution, is this reproduced in > the image as 1 pixel per FFT bin? 1 pixels per 3 times of FFT. 0.13 Hz is a mistake, 8 sec FFT yelds 0.25 Hz total up and down. 0.13 is a halfwidth. Just see Gus with 1 pixel per FFT. 3 times averagin is better :-) And what is the reason for the fine vertical > grid? It seems that the (incoherent?) averaging is now set to 24 s/pixel. Yes, 3 times averaging yelds 24 s/pixel. Is > there no temporal overlap between consecutive FFT windows? I am not sure. Seems there is not. 73 de RA9MB/Alex http://www.qsl.net/ra9mb