Return-Path: Received: (qmail 12332 invoked from network); 24 Jan 2005 08:48:16 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ptb-spamcore02.plus.net) (192.168.71.3) by ptb-mailstore01.plus.net with SMTP; 24 Jan 2005 08:48:16 -0000 Received: from mailnull by ptb-spamcore02.plus.net with spamcore-l-b (Exim 4.32; FreeBSD) id 1Cszpz-000EiR-1l for dave@picks.force9.co.uk; Mon, 24 Jan 2005 08:44:45 +0000 Received: from [192.168.67.2] (helo=ptb-mxcore02.plus.net) by ptb-spamcore02.plus.net with esmtp (Exim 4.32; FreeBSD) id 1Cszpy-000EiF-MK for dave@picks.force9.co.uk; Mon, 24 Jan 2005 08:44:42 +0000 Received: from post.thorcom.com ([193.82.116.20]) by ptb-mxcore02.plus.net with esmtp (Exim) id 1CsztN-000DRp-7o for dave@picks.force9.co.uk; Mon, 24 Jan 2005 08:48:13 +0000 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1CszqG-0003Hu-Qv for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Mon, 24 Jan 2005 08:45:00 +0000 Received: from [193.82.116.30] (helo=relay.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1CszqG-0003Hj-7J for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 24 Jan 2005 08:45:00 +0000 Received: from relay.sotline.ru ([80.89.139.226]) by relay.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1CszqD-0000GF-8W for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 24 Jan 2005 08:45:00 +0000 Received: from astral.omskcity.com (mxs.sotline.ru [80.89.139.227]) by relay.sotline.ru (8.12.8p2/8.12.8) with ESMTP id j0O8ic1B097135 for ; Mon, 24 Jan 2005 14:44:38 +0600 (OMST) (envelope-from fitec@omskcity.com) Received: from noname.nodomain.nowhere (host244.m04.dial.sotline.ru [81.176.51.244]) by astral.omskcity.com (8.x.x) with ESMTP id j0O8iabA006167 for ; Mon, 24 Jan 2005 14:44:37 +0600 (OS) Received: from localhost (fitec@localhost) by noname.nodomain.nowhere (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id PAA00222 for ; Mon, 24 Jan 2005 15:02:10 GMT X-Authentication-Warning: noname.nodomain.nowhere: fitec owned process doing -bs Date: Mon, 24 Jan 2005 15:02:10 +0000 (GMT) From: "Alexander S. Yurkov" To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SPF-Result: relay.thorcom.net: domain of omskcity.com designates 80.89.139.226 as permitted sender X-Spam-Score: 1.3 (+) X-Spam-Report: autolearn=no,DATE_IN_FUTURE_06_12=1.202,FORGED_RCVD_HELO=0.05 Subject: LF: weak sigs Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.9 required=5.0 tests=DATE_IN_FUTURE_06_12 autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-Spam-Filtered: by PlusNet SpamCORE (v3.00) Content-transfer-encoding: 8bit On Mon, 24 Jan 2005, Alexander S. Yurkov wrote: > I saw very weak sigs tonight around 137700. Screenshort attached. I will monitor freq from 137690 to 137750 next night (18-00 to 02-00 Z 24 Jan). Frequency resolution will be 0.13 Hz (best resolution permited by my old computer). This means abt 8 sec FFT. Also averaging will be 6. Total time of one pixel abt 24 sec. Please any beacon on QRSS60 or QRSS120. QRSS30 also may will be seeing. When change freq resolution from 0.5 Hz to 0.13 Hz I have impruve DCF39 reciption from 10 to abt 20 dB sig/noise at day time. Now (daytime) DCF39 is about 20 db over noise. Hope in night time it will be up to 50 db (best S/N of DCF39 with 0.5 Hz was 40 or 45 db, usualy it was 30 db). HPE CU VY SOON! 73 de RA9MB/Alex http://www.qsl.net/ra9mb