Return-Path: Received: (qmail 37501 invoked from network); 9 Jan 2005 10:24:43 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ptb-spamcore02.plus.net) (192.168.71.3) by ptb-mailstore02.plus.net with SMTP; 9 Jan 2005 10:24:43 -0000 Received: from mailnull by ptb-spamcore02.plus.net with spamcore-l-b (Exim 4.32; FreeBSD) id 1CnaEv-0008iG-Mu for dave@picks.force9.co.uk; Sun, 09 Jan 2005 10:24:06 +0000 Received: from [192.168.67.1] (helo=ptb-mxcore01.plus.net) by ptb-spamcore02.plus.net with esmtp (Exim 4.32; FreeBSD) id 1CnaEv-0008iD-KA for dave@picks.force9.co.uk; Sun, 09 Jan 2005 10:24:05 +0000 Received: from post.thorcom.com ([193.82.116.20]) by ptb-mxcore01.plus.net with esmtp (Exim 4.30; FreeBSD) id 1CnaFX-0007To-6n for dave@picks.force9.co.uk; Sun, 09 Jan 2005 10:24:43 +0000 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1CnaDE-0003Xv-FD for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Sun, 09 Jan 2005 10:22:20 +0000 Received: from [193.82.116.30] (helo=relay.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1CnaDE-0003Xm-1Q for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 09 Jan 2005 10:22:20 +0000 Received: from relay.sotline.ru ([80.89.139.226]) by relay.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1CnaDA-000096-8I for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 09 Jan 2005 10:22:20 +0000 Received: from astral.omskcity.com (mxs.sotline.ru [80.89.139.227]) by relay.sotline.ru (8.12.8p2/8.12.8) with ESMTP id j09AMD5n056867 for ; Sun, 9 Jan 2005 16:22:13 +0600 (OMST) (envelope-from fitec@omskcity.com) Received: from noname.nodomain.nowhere (host196.m02.dial.sotline.ru [81.176.51.196]) by astral.omskcity.com (8.x.x) with ESMTP id j09AMBCk007667 for ; Sun, 9 Jan 2005 16:22:12 +0600 (OS) Received: from localhost (fitec@localhost) by noname.nodomain.nowhere (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id QAA00270 for ; Sun, 9 Jan 2005 16:40:45 GMT X-Authentication-Warning: noname.nodomain.nowhere: fitec owned process doing -bs Date: Sun, 9 Jan 2005 16:40:45 +0000 (GMT) From: "Alexander S. Yurkov" To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SPF-Result: relay.thorcom.net: domain of omskcity.com designates 80.89.139.226 as permitted sender X-Spam-Score: 1.3 (+) X-Spam-Report: autolearn=no,DATE_IN_FUTURE_06_12=1.202,FORGED_RCVD_HELO=0.05 Subject: Re: LF: Antenna plans de J. Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.9 required=5.0 tests=DATE_IN_FUTURE_06_12 autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-Spam-Filtered: by PlusNet SpamCORE (v3.00) Content-transfer-encoding: 8bit On Sun, 9 Jan 2005, Alexander S. Yurkov wrote: > system connected to the ground. I do not know definitely. But though it > should be isolated from the ground. Then one need use transformer betwin > TX and antenna. Certanly may be it is more easy to build more powerful TX not such a complex antenna because You have ERP restriction. All of this can be more interesting fo Russians where there is no ERP restriction but there is TX power restriction. 73 de RA9MB/Alex http://www.qsl.net/ra9mb