Return-Path: Received: (qmail 74939 invoked from network); 9 Jan 2005 10:12:53 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ptb-spamcore01.plus.net) (192.168.71.1) by ptb-mailstore01.plus.net with SMTP; 9 Jan 2005 10:12:53 -0000 Received: from mailnull by ptb-spamcore01.plus.net with spamcore-l-b (Exim 4.32; FreeBSD) id 1Cna3d-000CCi-K8 for dave@picks.force9.co.uk; Sun, 09 Jan 2005 10:12:29 +0000 Received: from [192.168.67.1] (helo=ptb-mxcore01.plus.net) by ptb-spamcore01.plus.net with esmtp (Exim 4.32; FreeBSD) id 1Cna3d-000CCe-GU for dave@picks.force9.co.uk; Sun, 09 Jan 2005 10:12:25 +0000 Received: from post.thorcom.com ([193.82.116.20]) by ptb-mxcore01.plus.net with esmtp (Exim 4.30; FreeBSD) id 1Cna40-000CO9-TF for dave@picks.force9.co.uk; Sun, 09 Jan 2005 10:12:48 +0000 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1Cna2q-0003UJ-0r for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Sun, 09 Jan 2005 10:11:36 +0000 Received: from [193.82.116.30] (helo=relay.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1Cna2p-0003UA-Jy for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 09 Jan 2005 10:11:35 +0000 Received: from relay.sotline.ru ([80.89.139.226]) by relay.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Cna2m-00006x-T1 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 09 Jan 2005 10:11:35 +0000 Received: from astral.omskcity.com (mxs.sotline.ru [80.89.139.227]) by relay.sotline.ru (8.12.8p2/8.12.8) with ESMTP id j09ABR5n056184 for ; Sun, 9 Jan 2005 16:11:27 +0600 (OMST) (envelope-from fitec@omskcity.com) Received: from noname.nodomain.nowhere (host196.m02.dial.sotline.ru [81.176.51.196]) by astral.omskcity.com (8.x.x) with ESMTP id j09ABPa4007198 for ; Sun, 9 Jan 2005 16:11:26 +0600 (OS) Received: from localhost (fitec@localhost) by noname.nodomain.nowhere (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id QAA00243 for ; Sun, 9 Jan 2005 16:28:52 GMT X-Authentication-Warning: noname.nodomain.nowhere: fitec owned process doing -bs Date: Sun, 9 Jan 2005 16:28:52 +0000 (GMT) From: "Alexander S. Yurkov" To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org In-Reply-To: <009401c4f622$24ab3ee0$6401a8c0@eagles> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SPF-Result: relay.thorcom.net: domain of omskcity.com designates 80.89.139.226 as permitted sender X-Spam-Score: 1.3 (+) X-Spam-Report: autolearn=no,DATE_IN_FUTURE_06_12=1.202,FORGED_RCVD_HELO=0.05 Subject: Re: LF: Antenna plans de J. Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.9 required=5.0 tests=DATE_IN_FUTURE_06_12 autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-Spam-Filtered: by PlusNet SpamCORE (v3.00) Content-transfer-encoding: 8bit On Sun, 9 Jan 2005, J. Allen wrote: > > The antenna is in a flat mountain valley far from any trees, but it has a > long low house running from about 7 meters to about 27 meters from the base > of the vertical tower. Other buildings and wiring are rare and farther > away. The site is very "open" other than the one close house. There are no > other towers or antennas on the site. It is exelent condition! Seems in such a condition it is posible to get effectivity of few (2-5) percent! If use large and optimal loading coil with good Litz wire and good elevated conterpoise system. Indeed capacitance of Your antenna is of order 1500 pF. Then reactance of loading coil is of order 700 Ohm. Loading coil of 1 m diameter with good 'fat' Litz wire can give Q-factor of order 1000 or may be 2000 (RU6LA wrote me his Q-factor of such a coil was of order 2000). Then coil active resistance is about 0.5 Ohm only! If there is no ground loss then effectivity is 0.2/(0.5+0.2)= 0.29 or 29 percent!!! Certanly in this case main quation is ground loss. Seems if build good conerpoise system it is posible achive 1 Ohm of ground loss. It means 0.2/(0.2+0.5+1)=0.12 or 12 percent of effectivity. It is not easy of cose! May be one need to 'screen' the nearest building by few wires, connected to conerpoise system. Also ineresting quation is should or not be conterpoise system connected to the ground. I do not know definitely. But though it should be isolated from the ground. Then one need use transformer betwin TX and antenna. Any way with such a rare condition You can do very interesting and usefull experiments! Try to do some experiment with conterpoise system trying achive as less input resistance (then You get maximum of current) as posible. Worth quation is soil type of cose... > > I understand that the effect of the environment is impossible to calculate, > but is there a general direction that the environment moves the > resistance... does it normally move the resistance up from the calculated > values or its it sometimes up and sometimes down... I can not imagine enviroment moves resistance down. Certanly I meaan not metalic enviroment. Up only, this is loss. More loss - more resistance. What is the experience > that most LF operators have found? Usualy few tens of Ohms. But this is for bad enviroment. For Your good (and rare) conditions I hope it will be less then 10 Ohm. May be (?) not significant at all. Ground resistance can be calculated by NEC-2 (eznec-2). But ONLY for elevated conterpoise and one SHOULD use Sommerfeld-Norton method for ground description (there is no such a method in elnec). > I am only curious about this.... My intention is to measure the installed > antenna with its upper loading coils in place, and then add the amount of > fixed and variable base loading necessary to make the antenna resonant. I > understand that this is the normal method... Is this correct? Shure! 73 de RA9MB/Alex http://www.qsl.net/ra9mb