Return-Path: Received: (qmail 79189 invoked from network); 1 Jan 2005 16:51:58 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ptb-spamcore01.plus.net) (192.168.71.1) by ptb-mailstore01.plus.net with SMTP; 1 Jan 2005 16:51:58 -0000 Received: from mailnull by ptb-spamcore01.plus.net with spamcore-l-b (Exim 4.32; FreeBSD) id 1CkmSQ-000Crb-46 for dave@picks.force9.co.uk; Sat, 01 Jan 2005 16:50:27 +0000 Received: from [192.168.67.3] (helo=ptb-mxcore03.plus.net) by ptb-spamcore01.plus.net with esmtp (Exim 4.32; FreeBSD) id 1CkmSP-000CrW-VI for dave@picks.force9.co.uk; Sat, 01 Jan 2005 16:50:26 +0000 Received: from post.thorcom.com ([193.82.116.20]) by ptb-mxcore03.plus.net with esmtp (Exim) id 1CkmTs-0007bv-RQ for dave@picks.force9.co.uk; Sat, 01 Jan 2005 16:51:57 +0000 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1CkmTH-00041Y-Cv for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Sat, 01 Jan 2005 16:51:19 +0000 Received: from [193.82.116.30] (helo=relay.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1CkmTG-00041P-Tr for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sat, 01 Jan 2005 16:51:18 +0000 Received: from mout2.freenet.de ([194.97.50.155]) by relay.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.41) id 1CkmTC-0000mA-BK for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sat, 01 Jan 2005 16:51:18 +0000 Received: from [194.97.50.144] (helo=mx1.freenet.de) by mout2.freenet.de with esmtpa (Exim 4.43) id 1CkmTB-0000CE-U4 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sat, 01 Jan 2005 17:51:13 +0100 Received: from www3.emo.freenet-rz.de ([194.97.107.200]) by mx1.freenet.de with esmtp (Exim 4.43 #13) id 1CkmTB-0001DL-Ss for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sat, 01 Jan 2005 17:51:13 +0100 Received: from www-data by www3.emo.freenet-rz.de with local (Exim 4.34 1 (Panther_1)) id 1CkmTA-0003AS-Gb for ; Sat, 01 Jan 2005 17:51:12 +0100 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org From: dl4yhf@freenet.de X-Priority: 3 X-Abuse: 505770703 / 212.185.230.15 MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: Date: Sat, 01 Jan 2005 17:51:12 +0100 X-Warning: freenet.de is listed at abuse.rfc-ignorant.org X-SPF-Result: relay.thorcom.net: 194.97.50.155 is neither permitted nor denied by domain of freenet.de X-Spam-Score: 1.4 (+) X-Spam-Report: autolearn=no,NO_REAL_NAME=0.178,PRIORITY_NO_NAME=1.185 Subject: Re: LF: MSK Test Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.1 required=5.0 tests=NO_REAL_NAME,PRIORITY_NO_NAME autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-Spam-Filtered: by PlusNet SpamCORE (v3.00) Hello John and group, Thanks for the MSK tests, and for the info ... well then let's say Ko was the first in EU who successfully decoded MSK here. I am still a bit sceptical if the signal wouldn't suffer from phase disturbances due to groundwave/skywave interference too much, since there is less phase reserve than in a BPSK signal (of course, if a coherent demodulator was used). But because MSK08 and MSK31 will never be "very-weak-signal modes" compared to QRSS, JASON, WOLF and Co, it shouldn't be a big issue. I have returned from the 440 kHz receiving session to a very very quiet 136 kHz band, and am still hoping for some activity in regular CW, or whatever