Return-Path: Received: (qmail 7395 invoked from network); 5 Jan 2005 12:09:44 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ptb-spamcore02.plus.net) (192.168.71.3) by ptb-mailstore02.plus.net with SMTP; 5 Jan 2005 12:09:44 -0000 Received: from mailnull by ptb-spamcore02.plus.net with spamcore-l-b (Exim 4.32; FreeBSD) id 1Cm9xh-000ETP-Fa for dave@picks.force9.co.uk; Wed, 05 Jan 2005 12:08:27 +0000 Received: from [192.168.67.1] (helo=ptb-mxcore01.plus.net) by ptb-spamcore02.plus.net with esmtp (Exim 4.32; FreeBSD) id 1Cm9xh-000ETM-9b for dave@picks.force9.co.uk; Wed, 05 Jan 2005 12:08:25 +0000 Received: from post.thorcom.com ([193.82.116.20]) by ptb-mxcore01.plus.net with esmtp (Exim 4.30; FreeBSD) id 1Cm9yv-0003Jv-Fn for dave@picks.force9.co.uk; Wed, 05 Jan 2005 12:09:41 +0000 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1Cm9yI-0003ZT-Sa for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Wed, 05 Jan 2005 12:09:02 +0000 Received: from [193.82.116.30] (helo=relay.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1Cm9yI-0003ZK-D1 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 05 Jan 2005 12:09:02 +0000 Received: from gwout.thalesgroup.com ([195.101.39.227]) by relay.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.41) id 1Cm9y6-0000M7-DQ for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 05 Jan 2005 12:09:02 +0000 Received: from thalescan.corp.thales (200.3.2.3) by GWOUT.thalesgroup.com (NPlex 6.5.026) id 41DBAB1B00021AD8 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 13:08:29 +0100 Received: from hiplex.tsbh.thales ([10.33.19.4]) by thalescan with InterScan Messaging Security Suite; Wed, 05 Jan 2005 13:08:24 +0100 Received: from hiplex.tsbh.thales (10.33.21.5) by hiplex.tsbh.thales (NPlex 6.5.026) id 4198ECC5001EA2F3 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 13:08:24 +0100 Received: from complex.tcfr.thales ([202.3.3.26]) by hiplex with InterScan Messaging Security Suite; Wed, 05 Jan 2005 13:08:23 +0100 Received: from complex.tcfr.thales (202.3.3.26) by complex.tcfr.thales (NPlex 6.5.026) id 41CBE7E50003C0AE for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 13:07:50 +0100 Received: from NODALNET.clb.tcfr.thales ([146.11.5.4]) by complex with InterScan Messaging Security Suite; Wed, 05 Jan 2005 13:07:49 +0100 Received: by nodalnet.clb.tcfr.thales with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) id ; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 13:09:42 +0100 Message-ID: <8840D182F8BB7540B173D2B1FA0CA9AB034FEE8F@argos.clb.tcfr.thales> From: Jean-Louis.RAULT@fr.thalesgroup.com To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Date: Wed, 5 Jan 2005 13:09:36 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) X-SPF-Result: relay.thorcom.net: 195.101.39.227 is neither permitted nor denied by domain of fr.thalesgroup.com X-Spam-Score: 0.2 (/) X-Spam-Report: autolearn=no,NO_REAL_NAME=0.178 Subject: LF: RE: Re: RE: Re: DI2AG 440KHz...rapid fading Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.3 required=5.0 tests=NO_REAL_NAME autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-Spam-Filtered: by PlusNet SpamCORE (v3.00) Hello Alan Thanks for your interesting suggestion. I'm wondering why the "oscillating mirror" frequency would decrease when time passes. The amplitude of a jelly portion wobble decreases when the losses dampen the oscillations, but not the frequency which remains stable. So I would expect some diminishing QSB amplitude on the DI2AG records, and not QSB frequency decrease. Please what is the underlying theory about this frequency vs time decrease ? 73 Jean-Louis F6AGR > -----Message d'origine----- > De : owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org > [mailto:owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org]De la part de Alan Melia > Envoyé : mardi 4 janvier 2005 18:17 > À : rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org > Objet : LF: Re: RE: Re: DI2AG 440KHz...rapid fading > > > Hi Jean-Louis, and Walter. I see a rapid almost cyclical > fading on some > 136kHz signals immediately after a geomagnetic storm (we have > had several > minor storms Kp=5 recently), the period usually lengthens on > successive > nights. I have suggested that this might be due to the plasma cloud > "slapping" the ionosphere on one side and it then "ringing" > like a wobbly > jelly ( I must have eaten too much this Christmas !!) This > would cause the > "reflection" level to move up and down a few hundreds of > metres maybe even a > kilometre, which is quite sufficient to swing through a > 180degree phase > change. The movement required for a "null" at 440kHz is much > less than at > 136kHz. I would certainly be interested to see if the period > of the fades > increases over the course of the next few nights. > > Cheers de Alan G3NYK > alan.melia(at)btinternet.com > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: > To: > Sent: 04 January 2005 13:48 > Subject: LF: RE: Re: DI2AG 440KHz > > > > Walter et al. > > > > I recorded your DI2AG sigs last night from 6 PM to 6 AM . > > A quick exam on the 150 ARGO snapshots during my tea time early this > morning tend to show a deep QSB (period around 1 minute). > > Have you got other similar remarks ? > > > > 73 > > > > Jean-Louis F6AGR > > Loc. JN18DQ, near Paris > > >