Return-Path: Received: (qmail 2860 invoked from network); 5 Jan 2005 09:14:17 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ptb-spamcore02.plus.net) (192.168.71.3) by ptb-mailstore02.plus.net with SMTP; 5 Jan 2005 09:14:17 -0000 Received: from mailnull by ptb-spamcore02.plus.net with spamcore-l-b (Exim 4.32; FreeBSD) id 1Cm7Ds-000EWd-6b for dave@picks.force9.co.uk; Wed, 05 Jan 2005 09:12:59 +0000 Received: from [192.168.67.1] (helo=ptb-mxcore01.plus.net) by ptb-spamcore02.plus.net with esmtp (Exim 4.32; FreeBSD) id 1Cm7Dr-000EWG-K1 for dave@picks.force9.co.uk; Wed, 05 Jan 2005 09:12:55 +0000 Received: from post.thorcom.com ([193.82.116.20]) by ptb-mxcore01.plus.net with esmtp (Exim 4.30; FreeBSD) id 1Cm7F0-000DJm-3K for dave@picks.force9.co.uk; Wed, 05 Jan 2005 09:14:09 +0000 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1Cm7E8-0002vd-AN for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Wed, 05 Jan 2005 09:13:12 +0000 Received: from [193.82.116.30] (helo=relay.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1Cm7E7-0002vU-OM for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 05 Jan 2005 09:13:11 +0000 Received: from imo-m24.mx.aol.com ([64.12.137.5]) by relay.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.41) id 1Cm7Dy-0008B0-Uq for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 05 Jan 2005 09:13:11 +0000 Received: from G0MRF@aol.com by imo-m24.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v37_r3.8.) id l.82.1ecc794c (24895) for ; Wed, 5 Jan 2005 04:12:52 -0500 (EST) From: G0MRF@aol.com Message-ID: <82.1ecc794c.2f0d0993@aol.com> Date: Wed, 5 Jan 2005 04:12:51 EST To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: 9.0 SE for Windows sub 5003 X-SPF-Result: relay.thorcom.net: domain of aol.com designates 64.12.137.5 as permitted sender X-Spam-Score: 0.2 (/) X-Spam-Report: autolearn=no,HTML_30_40=0.056,HTML_MESSAGE=0.001,NO_REAL_NAME=0.178 Subject: LF: Pre-amps on LF Content-Type: text/html; charset=windows-1252 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.3 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,NO_REAL_NAME autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-Spam-Filtered: by PlusNet SpamCORE (v3.00) Content-transfer-encoding: 8bit
In a message dated 04/01/2005 20:56:35 GMT Standard Time, dsp@hifidelity.com writes:
Hi Joe, Laurence,

I have an FT857D (a wattier 817) in my car, and its deafness is of heroic
proportions.  If I were asked to come up with something that worked so well at
HF but so dismally at LF, it'd be a struggle.  It can't hear an NDB unless it's
within about a hundred yards of it;  absolutely amazing.

So similarly, I use an Altoids tin containing a 500kHz low-pass filter and two
series'd preamps to render it useful.  Each preamp's configuration is based on:
Hello and happy new year to all.
 
There have been a number of postings about the poor response of amateur radio receivers on 136kHz.
 
The main reason for this lack of performance is usually the internal attenuator that is switched in below 1.8MHz. On ICOM radios, the broadband transformers also run out of performance below 500kHz. This general problem seems to be more severe with radios that have already had their performances streatched to cover the 6m band.  e.g. The FT1000 and TS850 work well ( 28MHz max) but the IC756 746 and the FT817 are about 20dB 'deaf'.
 
Adding a yxm/mrf pre-amp will overcome the loss of the input attenuator (apx 10dB) and will have a few extra dB to help things along. However, I have had a couple of mails from people who expected the pre-amps to work when they were added to simple small verticals or wires.
 
The pre-amps are 50 Ohms (ish) in and out while the  impedance of a typical 7MHz vertical is a very small fraction of 1 Ohm. The loss between them is huge. You need a matching network.
 
I remember in the early days of 136k here in the UK working one enterprising operator who had built a trasnsmitter and had matched his HF vertical by adding a reel of enamelled copper wire in series. Tuning was achieved by sliding a ferrite rod into the center of the reel and adjusting for best signal. - Wonderful!
 
A small antenna that works well is the e-field probe as promoted by AMRAD a few years ago. This is a short antenna with a very high input impedance FET amplifier.
However, the e-field probe is an exception. If you want to get any reasonable signal, you need to match the antenna................then on most amateur sets, add a pre-amp.
 
73
 
David   G0MRF