Return-Path: Received: (qmail 88049 invoked from network); 3 Jan 2005 07:58:50 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ptb-spamcore01.plus.net) (192.168.71.1) by ptb-mailstore01.plus.net with SMTP; 3 Jan 2005 07:58:50 -0000 Received: from mailnull by ptb-spamcore01.plus.net with spamcore-l-b (Exim 4.32; FreeBSD) id 1ClN5o-000GvS-DJ for dave@picks.force9.co.uk; Mon, 03 Jan 2005 07:57:33 +0000 Received: from [192.168.67.3] (helo=ptb-mxcore03.plus.net) by ptb-spamcore01.plus.net with esmtp (Exim 4.32; FreeBSD) id 1ClN5o-000GvO-5f for dave@picks.force9.co.uk; Mon, 03 Jan 2005 07:57:32 +0000 Received: from post.thorcom.com ([193.82.116.20]) by ptb-mxcore03.plus.net with esmtp (Exim) id 1ClN72-000HXL-Qa for dave@picks.force9.co.uk; Mon, 03 Jan 2005 07:58:48 +0000 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1ClN6Q-0002rh-3Q for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Mon, 03 Jan 2005 07:58:10 +0000 Received: from [193.82.116.30] (helo=relay.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1ClN6P-0002rY-NJ for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 03 Jan 2005 07:58:09 +0000 Received: from mail.mvnet.de ([194.25.108.14]) by relay.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.41) id 1ClN6K-0007jp-Vj for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 03 Jan 2005 07:58:09 +0000 Received: from falkenuge02.mvnet.de ([194.25.108.85]) by mail.mvnet.de (8.13.1/) with SMTP id j03800EZ031066 for ; Mon, 3 Jan 2005 09:00:00 +0100 Received: from no.name.available by falkenuge02.mvnet.de via smtpd (for mail.mvnet.de [194.25.108.14]) with SMTP; 3 Jan 2005 07:57:58 UT Received: from waechter2 ([10.10.0.7]) by mgwl01.mgw.mvnet.de (8.13.1/) with SMTP id j037vrOL016689 for ; Mon, 3 Jan 2005 08:57:53 +0100 Received: from 10.254.1.1 by argusauge (InterScan E-Mail VirusWall NT); Mon, 03 Jan 2005 09:00:09 +0100 Received: from [194.1.2.8] by adlerauge-11.mvnet.de via smtpd (for [10.254.1.10]) with SMTP; 3 Jan 2005 07:49:51 UT Received: by umnt02.umwelt.loc with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) id ; Mon, 3 Jan 2005 08:57:54 +0100 Message-ID: <53C2E6579EEFE245951674BE4CD693622F37AA@umnt02.umwelt.loc> From: =?iso-8859-1?Q?=22=28_UM=2C_300b=29_v=2E_Wedelst=E4dt=2C_Eberhard?= =?iso-8859-1?Q?=22?= To: "'rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org'" Date: Mon, 3 Jan 2005 08:57:52 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) X-SPF-Result: relay.thorcom.net: 194.25.108.14 is neither permitted nor denied by domain of um.mv-regierung.de X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: autolearn=failed,none Subject: LF: AW: Who was it on 137.500 kHz today ? Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-Spam-Filtered: by PlusNet SpamCORE (v3.00) Greetings and a happy new year to all i was it on 137,500, but the power adsorb in wet trees around the antenna next time on 137,500 up ? Regards, Eberhard, DL3ZID -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- Von: Wolf DL4YHF [mailto:dl4yhf@freenet.de] Gesendet: Sonntag, 2. Januar 2005 20:57 An: RSGB LF Group Betreff: LF: Who was it on 137.500 kHz today ? Greetings all, When testing various digital and visible modes on 137.5 kHz today, someone called me with a rather weak signal which could hardly be seen on the spectrogram. It was not decodable due to strong local QRM and strong Loran interference. So, whoeever it was, thanks for your patience and hope to work you soon under better conditions. Besides this, very little EU activity in any mode. A strong signal from YU7AR in the evening, but got no reply when calling in QRSS3 . One new (?) station DL4EAU in the log, Tom uses a 60 Watt transverter and a 15 m vertical, but his "provisional" rig put out a nice signal in regular CW. DI2AG on 440 kHz was very strong at times, but haven't added more screenshots to my "DI2AG report" website . The fast and deep QSB on MW is totally different from the slow QSB we see at LW . Regards, Wolf DL4YHF .