Return-Path: Received: (qmail 41694 invoked from network); 10 Jan 2005 01:33:45 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ptb-spamcore02.plus.net) (192.168.71.3) by ptb-mailstore01.plus.net with SMTP; 10 Jan 2005 01:33:45 -0000 Received: from mailnull by ptb-spamcore02.plus.net with spamcore-l-b (Exim 4.32; FreeBSD) id 1CnoQh-000Kef-Kh for dave@picks.force9.co.uk; Mon, 10 Jan 2005 01:33:13 +0000 Received: from [192.168.67.3] (helo=ptb-mxcore03.plus.net) by ptb-spamcore02.plus.net with esmtp (Exim 4.32; FreeBSD) id 1CnoQh-000Kec-Hn for dave@picks.force9.co.uk; Mon, 10 Jan 2005 01:33:11 +0000 Received: from post.thorcom.com ([193.82.116.20]) by ptb-mxcore03.plus.net with esmtp (Exim) id 1CnoRC-000J1D-SI for dave@picks.force9.co.uk; Mon, 10 Jan 2005 01:33:42 +0000 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1CnoQ9-00065z-Nc for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Mon, 10 Jan 2005 01:32:37 +0000 Received: from [193.82.116.30] (helo=relay.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1CnoQ9-00065q-Cb for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 10 Jan 2005 01:32:37 +0000 Received: from ham2.cc.fer.hr ([161.53.16.179]) by relay.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1CnoQ7-0002iF-0m for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 10 Jan 2005 01:32:37 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0AF67932D3 for ; Mon, 10 Jan 2005 02:32:28 +0100 (CET) Received: from ham2.cc.fer.hr ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (ham2 [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 13655-09 for ; Mon, 10 Jan 2005 02:32:26 +0100 (CET) Received: from 9a0tcp.ampr.org (ham1.cc.fer.hr [161.53.16.178]) by ham2.cc.fer.hr (Postfix) with SMTP id 76771932CF for ; Mon, 10 Jan 2005 02:32:26 +0100 (CET) X-BBS-Msg-Type: P Date: Mon, 10 Jan 05 02:19:29 +0100 Message-Id: <42946_9A0TCP@hamradio> From: dl8aam@9a0tcp.ampr.org To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-phx (Debian) at ham2.cc.fer.hr X-SPF-Result: relay.thorcom.net: 161.53.16.179 is neither permitted nor denied by domain of 9a0tcp.ampr.org X-Spam-Score: 0.2 (/) X-Spam-Report: autolearn=no,FORGED_RCVD_HELO=0.05,NO_REAL_NAME=0.178 Subject: LF: re: DI2AG X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.3 required=5.0 tests=NO_REAL_NAME autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-Spam-Filtered: by PlusNet SpamCORE (v3.00) Content-type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-transfer-encoding: 8bit Hi, still nothing here (JO41xn), which is only few 100s kms away. I want to ask, if anyone else did copy a data (maybe PSK) station on 441.x kHz too, or this one is a ghost signal made by my TS-50. On 440 I only could copy the NDB beacons DRE (Poland) and PIA (Italy), bith strong, DRE as the strongest. Up/Down a bit I could copy PE & B from Slovakia and CK from Czech Rep. As I have now about 600 different NDB beacons logged the last months my RX system (TS-50 and DX-88 vertical...hi) is not the worst'est, not really good but not too bad either...hi Logged NDBs from OX to Russia, North Norway to Northern Africa, including Cape Verde and CU/CT3. But til now absolutly nothing from DI2AG. Copied some german and swedish stations on 136 kHz the last weeks, which might be the same power range (and antenna?) as DI2AG. I still have some hope to catch DI2AG, and to get my first DI QSL ;-) But the 440 spot is not the best choise, 460-465 would be much better, as there are nearly no active NDBs logged by (at least) european NDB DXer, OK not much, but 440 is crowded ;-) 73, Tom - DL8AAM