Return-Path: Received: (qmail 60145 invoked from network); 9 Jan 2005 17:28:44 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ptb-spamcore01.plus.net) (192.168.71.1) by ptb-mailstore02.plus.net with SMTP; 9 Jan 2005 17:28:44 -0000 Received: from mailnull by ptb-spamcore01.plus.net with spamcore-l-b (Exim 4.32; FreeBSD) id 1CngrV-000KBO-LF for dave@picks.force9.co.uk; Sun, 09 Jan 2005 17:28:23 +0000 Received: from [192.168.67.1] (helo=ptb-mxcore01.plus.net) by ptb-spamcore01.plus.net with esmtp (Exim 4.32; FreeBSD) id 1CngrV-000KBK-HT for dave@picks.force9.co.uk; Sun, 09 Jan 2005 17:28:21 +0000 Received: from post.thorcom.com ([193.82.116.20]) by ptb-mxcore01.plus.net with esmtp (Exim 4.30; FreeBSD) id 1Cngrq-0006tW-BB for dave@picks.force9.co.uk; Sun, 09 Jan 2005 17:28:42 +0000 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1CngqR-0004xY-Ld for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Sun, 09 Jan 2005 17:27:15 +0000 Received: from [193.82.116.30] (helo=relay.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1CngqR-0004xP-AJ for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 09 Jan 2005 17:27:15 +0000 Received: from mailout01.sul.t-online.com ([194.25.134.80]) by relay.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1CngqO-0001PK-Uv for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 09 Jan 2005 17:27:15 +0000 Received: from fwd10.aul.t-online.de by mailout01.sul.t-online.com with smtp id 1CngqJ-0004fM-07; Sun, 09 Jan 2005 18:27:07 +0100 Received: from (XjxOyqZCgeV9d8LakJ--NMiREtnyDzfAP9MzYgpmwtymrhYppbsdUo@[217.251.188.54]) by fwd10.sul.t-online.com with smtp id 1CngqF-1l8DPk0; Sun, 9 Jan 2005 18:27:03 +0100 From: jannsen <0482183881-0001@t-online.de> To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <41E14CB5.5010609@freenet.de> X-Mailer: T-Online eMail 2.34 MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Sun, 9 Jan 2005 18:27:03 +0100 Message-ID: <1CngqF-1l8DPk0@fwd10.sul.t-online.com> X-ID: XjxOyqZCgeV9d8LakJ--NMiREtnyDzfAP9MzYgpmwtymrhYppbsdUo X-TOI-MSGID: 5add7003-17c9-4e81-848b-58541a8164f1 X-SPF-Result: relay.thorcom.net: 194.25.134.80 is neither permitted nor denied by domain of t-online.de X-Spam-Score: 2.0 (++) X-Spam-Report: autolearn=no,FROM_ENDS_IN_NUMS=0.516,FROM_STARTS_WITH_NUMS=1.492 Subject: Re: LF: Sunday activity reports Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: ** X-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.4 required=5.0 tests=FROM_ENDS_IN_NUMS, FROM_STARTS_WITH_NUMS autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-Spam-Filtered: by PlusNet SpamCORE (v3.00) Wolf DL4YHF schrieb: > Greetings all, > > Thanks for all reception reports for DF0WD (direct, or via reflector). I > actually got more reports from SWLs ("LWL's") through the internet than > replies on the band - maybe the mix of digital modes was a bit too much > for one afternoon (though I tried normal CW as well). > Worked DK6NI in CW, DL3ZID in Jason and PSK08, saw OK2BVG and others > calling in QRSS, missed S52AB again, and spent some time thinking about > how to build my next LF transmitter (which may use a phasing exciter > driven by quadrature outputs from at least *two* different programs out > there) . No more details yet to avoid hijacking the subject ;-) > > 73, Wolf DL4YHF . > > Hi Wolf, an other report: here in JO43SV 100% readings of all modes transmitted by DF0WD. strange: Eberhard/DL3ZID was vy strong too but I couldnt decode any single letter of his transmissions some 5Hz off the QRG. (I admit I only cld monitor abt 10mins). regards Uwe/dj8wx