Return-Path: Received: (qmail 95482 invoked from network); 10 Jan 2005 01:04:36 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ptb-spamcore01.plus.net) (192.168.71.1) by ptb-mailstore01.plus.net with SMTP; 10 Jan 2005 01:04:36 -0000 Received: from mailnull by ptb-spamcore01.plus.net with spamcore-l-b (Exim 4.32; FreeBSD) id 1Cnnyc-0004Ut-QC for dave@picks.force9.co.uk; Mon, 10 Jan 2005 01:04:11 +0000 Received: from [192.168.67.1] (helo=ptb-mxcore01.plus.net) by ptb-spamcore01.plus.net with esmtp (Exim 4.32; FreeBSD) id 1Cnnyc-0004Uj-Dt for dave@picks.force9.co.uk; Mon, 10 Jan 2005 01:04:10 +0000 Received: from post.thorcom.com ([193.82.116.20]) by ptb-mxcore01.plus.net with esmtp (Exim 4.30; FreeBSD) id 1Cnnyu-000FD4-CZ for dave@picks.force9.co.uk; Mon, 10 Jan 2005 01:04:28 +0000 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1Cnnxf-00060L-PG for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Mon, 10 Jan 2005 01:03:11 +0000 Received: from [193.82.116.30] (helo=relay.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1Cnnxf-00060C-6p for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 10 Jan 2005 01:03:11 +0000 Received: from outbound04.telus.net ([199.185.220.223] helo=priv-edtnes51.telusplanet.net) by relay.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Cnnxd-0002eB-BV for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 10 Jan 2005 01:03:11 +0000 Received: from cognizant1 ([154.5.20.191]) by priv-edtnes51.telusplanet.net (InterMail vM.6.01.04.00 201-2131-118-20041027) with SMTP id <20050110010245.XMPP10557.priv-edtnes51.telusplanet.net@cognizant1> for ; Sun, 9 Jan 2005 18:02:45 -0700 Message-ID: <02c401c4f6b0$3e2e1160$0201a8c0@private.network> From: "Scott Tilley" To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <12c.54d56369.2f12680d@aol.com> <007801c4f6ac$9538ec40$6401a8c0@eagles> Date: Sun, 9 Jan 2005 17:03:48 -0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106 X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 X-SPF-Result: relay.thorcom.net: domain of telus.net designates 199.185.220.223 as permitted sender X-Spam-Score: 0.6 (/) X-Spam-Report: autolearn=no,FORGED_RCVD_HELO=0.05,FROM_ENDS_IN_NUMS=0.516 Subject: LF: Re: Antenna plans de J. Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.9 required=5.0 tests=FROM_ENDS_IN_NUMS autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-Spam-Filtered: by PlusNet SpamCORE (v3.00) J. Canada's position for WRC-2007 is to allow amatuers 1W EIRP. If you used that as your 'reference' then you shouldn't go wrong. I asked for 1W EIRP to keep my experiment in line with the work that is going on to get the band approved. 73 Scott ----- Original Message ----- From: "J. Allen" To: Sent: Sunday, January 09, 2005 4:37 PM Subject: LF: Antenna plans de J. > Alex, Jim, Markus, and LF, > > The reason for setting my calculations in front of all, is that I am new to > LF and want the station to have early success, rather than being a set of > mistakes and recoveries. You might be surprised, but although I am a 4th > dan black belt and head of TaeKwon-Do Yukon, I am not a fighter, and have a > tendency to give up on things which I have made a solid attempt at and find > repeated failures. > > The reason for using the complicated antenna structure as I describe it is > that it is already standing... It is a large HF/MF V-beam with ~120 meter > legs up ~20 meters, with ~55 degree included angle. The antenna is fed > with 75 Ohm hard line which was in with a number of damaged tower sections > which I earned by cleaning up a commercial broadcasting station construction > site. The towers had been taken down by persons unknown who cut the guy > lines and let the towers fall! I use this antenna on 160-2 meters and it > functions quite well with an antenna tuner. It is the receive antenna which > I am now using on LF and although it is a sort of "short dipole"on LF, it > works very well. > > The area of the antenna for several KM in all directions is poor sandy soil. > > I have on site approximately 20 km of ~#10 copper-clad high-tensile steel > wire, which was used for overhead telephone wires for many years. This can > be buried for radials or more wires run up high to increase top capacitance. > How big does the elevated counterpoise need to be at LF to be effective? > With the wire I have available, I could make a fairly large one in terms of > feet, but it would still be small in terms of wavelength. > > It may be easier to put a loading inductor out at the tower end of each > insulator, and add LF to the antenna use, than to build a new antenna > system. > > As to the typo.. It is not critical now that I know about it and can make > allowance for it... When the loading coils are in and measurements can be > take of the LF antenna as a system, I will again send calculations to the LF > reflector to make sure that I am not running more power than I should be. I > prefer to have someone look at my work. These are my limitations: > > Technical Operation Data: > -A transmitter will be used between the frequencies of 135.7 and 137.8kHz, > in the 2200 metre band. > > -Emissions outside of this frequency range will be suppressed by a minimum > of 30db from the fundamental signal. > > -Bandwidth of the transmitted signal will be limited to 100Hz or less. > > -Radiated power will not exceed 1 watt ERP. > > -The transmitter will be operated with care not to interfere with authorized > users. Authorization for experimental transmissions will be on a secondary > user basis. I am aware of Canadian military operations in this frequency > range and will avoid transmitting on their frequencies. Any requests from > primary users to cease transmission or to change frequency will be > immediately complied with. > > > I did not think to set 1W ERP relative to anything... I do not know what > Industry Canada normally measures it to, and will need advice from > experienced Canadian LF ops like Steve or Scott on the normal comparison for > ERP. > > Alex, Thank you for your continuing help. I am retired and live on a > fixed, small income. Litz (sp?) wire in not being considered. I have > friends at the local power company who are watching for a "pole pig" or > other transformer with a burned primary winding and good secondary, which I > can acquire at the value of the scrap copper within it. I plan to > disassemble it for the flat secondary copper strap winding, which is usually > well insulated with a material that looks like varnish. I have been given > three pieces of 13 inch X 36 inch long PVC pipe, which I was going to use > for loading coil forms (formers), but have been told that they are lossy and > I should use something else. At this point I am still planning to > disassemble the transformer, but I do not know whether to use the PVC and > accept the loss from it or to use another type of coil form. > > I have about 20 pieces of 5/16 inch X 60 inch fiberglass rods which I can > use to make a form if needed. > > I can move the V wire insulators out from the tower by a couple meters if it > will help. > > I have found this LF group to be friendly and supportive, and believe that > my chances of success are very likely to be a reflection of your direction. > > I appreciate the humor of the group as well. > > J. > > > >