Return-Path: Received: (qmail 64699 invoked from network); 12 Jan 2005 23:55:01 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ptb-spamcore02.plus.net) (192.168.71.3) by ptb-mailstore02.plus.net with SMTP; 12 Jan 2005 23:55:01 -0000 Received: from mailnull by ptb-spamcore02.plus.net with spamcore-l-b (Exim 4.32; FreeBSD) id 1CosKI-0003eW-Bu for dave@picks.force9.co.uk; Wed, 12 Jan 2005 23:54:59 +0000 Received: from [192.168.67.2] (helo=ptb-mxcore02.plus.net) by ptb-spamcore02.plus.net with esmtp (Exim 4.32; FreeBSD) id 1CosKH-0003eS-Sk for dave@picks.force9.co.uk; Wed, 12 Jan 2005 23:54:58 +0000 Received: from post.thorcom.com ([193.82.116.20]) by ptb-mxcore02.plus.net with esmtp (Exim) id 1CosKK-0007fN-9a for dave@picks.force9.co.uk; Wed, 12 Jan 2005 23:55:00 +0000 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1CosJb-0001M5-9i for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Wed, 12 Jan 2005 23:54:15 +0000 Received: from [193.82.116.30] (helo=relay.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1CosJa-0001Lw-TK for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 12 Jan 2005 23:54:14 +0000 Received: from mta206-rme.xtra.co.nz ([210.86.15.58]) by relay.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1CosJX-0008Ly-Ro for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 12 Jan 2005 23:54:14 +0000 Received: from pop2-rme.xtra.co.nz ([210.86.15.240]) by mta206-rme.xtra.co.nz with ESMTP id <20050112235351.KJSM17352.mta206-rme.xtra.co.nz@pop2-rme.xtra.co.nz> for ; Thu, 13 Jan 2005 12:53:51 +1300 Received: from quaycustomer ([210.86.67.224]) by pop2-rme.xtra.co.nz with SMTP id <20050112235351.SFSZ16943.pop2-rme.xtra.co.nz@quaycustomer> for ; Thu, 13 Jan 2005 12:53:51 +1300 Message-ID: <001601c4f903$09750aa0$c401a8c0@quaycustomer> From: "Vernall" To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <84LVRMIKJB6OJ4Y8295SN42APO3VKE.41e59320@Charlie_Drake> <009301c4f8f8$a2587320$122f8351@w4o8m9> Date: Thu, 13 Jan 2005 13:01:29 +1300 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 X-SPF-Result: relay.thorcom.net: 210.86.15.58 is neither permitted nor denied by domain of xtra.co.nz X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: autolearn=failed,none Subject: Re: LF: Audio Filters Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-Spam-Filtered: by PlusNet SpamCORE (v3.00) Hi all, I'm parallel to Jim M0BMU for regarding that QRSS reception via a sound card does not benefit from very narrow analogue filtering in the radio, or at audio prior to application to a sound card. A QRN spike causes ringing and nonlinearity in a receiver, and effectively subtracts from the remaining time when the noise to signal ratio is still satisfactory for Argo (or whatever FFT software) to grind out a useable result. QRN can also cause AGC hang. The least "outage" resulting from a QRN spike is with other than very narrow (analogue) bandwidth ... My QRSS DX receiving setting options are (I use a TS-850SAT): - IF noise blanker active (clips the spike at a system bandwidth of 16 kHz or so) - AGC on fast setting (quickest recovery following a spike) - IF bandwidth 270 or 500 Hz (and wider could be a tad better still?) - no outboard audio filtering before the sound card (thus no added ringing). 73, Bob ZL2CA ----- Original Message ----- From: "James Moritz" To: Sent: Thursday, January 13, 2005 11:45 AM Subject: Re: LF: Audio Filters > Dear Gary, LF group, > > The FFT process of the spectrogram does a very good filtering job, and the > sound card audio input has a surprisingly good dynamic range, being able to > cope with unwanted signals maybe 70dB or more stronger than the wanted > signal (at least, on the sound cards I have tried, which are nothing > special). The limiting factors usually seem to be distortion in the RX IF > and audio, and audio frequency hash which gets into the sound card from the > rest of the computer; unfortunately an external audio filter is not much > help with either of these. I find that using a very narrow IF or audio > bandwidth usually worsens the effect of QRN, something in the range 200 - > 1000Hz seems best. Where a very narrow bandwidth external audio filter IS > useful is for aural CW reception in the presence of QRM such as carriers or > other CW signals. > > Cheers, Jim Moritz > 73 de M0BMU > >