Return-Path: Received: (qmail 16243 invoked from network); 10 Jan 2005 15:17:43 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ptb-spamcore01.plus.net) (192.168.71.1) by ptb-mailstore01.plus.net with SMTP; 10 Jan 2005 15:17:43 -0000 Received: from mailnull by ptb-spamcore01.plus.net with spamcore-l-b (Exim 4.32; FreeBSD) id 1Co1IL-000Alx-WB for dave@picks.force9.co.uk; Mon, 10 Jan 2005 15:17:30 +0000 Received: from [192.168.67.3] (helo=ptb-mxcore03.plus.net) by ptb-spamcore01.plus.net with esmtp (Exim 4.32; FreeBSD) id 1Co1IL-000Alc-5b for dave@picks.force9.co.uk; Mon, 10 Jan 2005 15:17:25 +0000 Received: from post.thorcom.com ([193.82.116.20]) by ptb-mxcore03.plus.net with esmtp (Exim) id 1Co1IX-000O8C-TA for dave@picks.force9.co.uk; Mon, 10 Jan 2005 15:17:38 +0000 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1Co1FF-0007xM-VZ for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Mon, 10 Jan 2005 15:14:13 +0000 Received: from [193.82.116.30] (helo=relay.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1Co1FC-0007xD-W8 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 10 Jan 2005 15:14:10 +0000 Received: from smtp801.mail.ukl.yahoo.com ([217.12.12.138]) by relay.thorcom.net with smtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Co1F9-0005Gt-GY for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 10 Jan 2005 15:14:10 +0000 Received: from unknown (HELO Main) (Alan.Melia@81.131.53.133 with login) by smtp801.mail.ukl.yahoo.com with SMTP; 10 Jan 2005 15:13:57 -0000 Message-ID: <000001c4f727$00356120$6507a8c0@Main> From: "Alan Melia" To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <200501101145.45777.smtp01@email.it> Date: Mon, 10 Jan 2005 12:17:46 -0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4522.1200 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4522.1200 X-SPF-Result: relay.thorcom.net: 217.12.12.138 is neither permitted nor denied by domain of btinternet.com X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: autolearn=failed,none Subject: Re: LF: Re: Pre-amps on LF Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.1 required=5.0 tests=MAILTO_TO_SPAM_ADDR autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-Spam-Filtered: by PlusNet SpamCORE (v3.00) Claudio, I am a little confused. It is true that the minority carrier lifetime is short compared with the LF waveform period but surely this only really has any effect if you are trying to use the PIN diodes as attenuators. If you use them as switches and pass a few milliamps in the forward direct it is not relevant. This probably explains why our experiments on replacing the "ordinary" diodes with PINs in HF receivers (FRG7700) with octave front end filters have been unsuccessful. Some small switching or "signal" diodes worked better in terms of IMD that the PINs. It is possible the reverse attenuation of signal diodes will not be as good because their stray capacitance is usually higher, but if they are reverse biassed to separate the depletion layers they work very well.....and two can be connected in series to reduce the capacity. The cut off the high pass filter in many cases is the main culprit as there are I believe no LW BC stations in Japan or the far East. Increasing the series capacitors can lower the cut-off but this may not be as easy with modern SMD construction as it was with through board components in the FRG7700 and R1000 era. I find a lot of this equipment also has a 20dB extra attenuation switched in below 2MHz, usually on the AGC line. (I cannot say about the 817 on this score) Any modification of these radios to improve LF reception will require an external LP or BP filter to keep out strong BC signals. Cheers de Alan G3NYK ----- Original Message ----- From: "Claudio Pozzi" To: Sent: 10 January 2005 10:45 Subject: Re: LF: Re: Pre-amps on LF > Many RTX uses inexpensive diodes in the front-end design, for bandpass > filter and preamp and attenuator switching. > > Also if they used more expensive PIN diodes those devices are not the > best switching devices for LF. A 100 kHz PIN diode switching devices > require a minority carrier lifetime of few ten's of microseconds. If > the life time is shorter the diodes acts as a rectifier, not as a > switch. I don't know many PIN diodes useful in LF band. > > So I think that the problem is not in the mixer but in band switching > devices. > > 73 de Claudio, ik2pii > > -- > Claudio Pozzi - Happy Linux User - http://www.qsl.net/ik2pii > > > > > > > > -- > > Email.it, the professional e-mail, gratis per te: http://www.email.it/f > > > > Sponsor: > > Migliaia di manuali e guide scaricabili su: Office, Webmaster, Internet, Windows e non solo...clicca qui > > Clicca qui: http://adv.email.it/cgi-bin/foclick.cgi?mid=2731&d=10-1 >