Return-Path: Received: (qmail 58772 invoked from network); 26 Dec 2004 06:25:14 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ptb-spamcore01.plus.net) (192.168.71.1) by ptb-mailstore02.plus.net with SMTP; 26 Dec 2004 06:25:14 -0000 Received: from mailnull by ptb-spamcore01.plus.net with spamcore-l-b (Exim 4.32; FreeBSD) id 1CiSCk-000C3b-SU for dave@picks.force9.co.uk; Sun, 26 Dec 2004 06:48:39 +0000 Received: from [192.168.67.1] (helo=ptb-mxcore01.plus.net) by ptb-spamcore01.plus.net with esmtp (Exim 4.32; FreeBSD) id 1CiSCk-000C3S-Lq for dave@picks.force9.co.uk; Sun, 26 Dec 2004 06:48:38 +0000 Received: from post.thorcom.com ([193.82.116.20]) by ptb-mxcore01.plus.net with esmtp (Exim 4.30; FreeBSD) id 1CiRq5-000Nca-MJ for dave@picks.force9.co.uk; Sun, 26 Dec 2004 06:25:13 +0000 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1CiRpK-0001lE-Ci for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Sun, 26 Dec 2004 06:24:26 +0000 Received: from [193.82.116.30] (helo=relay.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1CiRpK-0001l5-1O for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 26 Dec 2004 06:24:26 +0000 Received: from simmts12.bellnexxia.net ([206.47.199.141] helo=simmts12-srv.bellnexxia.net) by relay.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.41) id 1CiRpI-00034u-7V for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 26 Dec 2004 06:24:26 +0000 Received: from [192.168.123.199] ([65.95.129.45]) by simmts12-srv.bellnexxia.net (InterMail vM.5.01.06.10 201-253-122-130-110-20040306) with ESMTP id <20041226062412.KAQ1542.simmts12-srv.bellnexxia.net@[192.168.123.199]> for ; Sun, 26 Dec 2004 01:24:12 -0500 User-Agent: Microsoft-Outlook-Express-Macintosh-Edition/5.0.6 Date: Sun, 26 Dec 2004 01:26:52 -0500 From: Mitch Powell To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <02e901c4eaf7$9e0b9f40$0201a8c0@private.network> Mime-version: 1.0 X-SPF-Result: relay.thorcom.net: 206.47.199.141 is neither permitted nor denied by domain of sympatico.ca X-Spam-Score: 1.3 (+) X-Spam-Report: autolearn=no,RCVD_IN_DSBL=1.101,RCVD_IN_NJABL=0.1,RCVD_IN_SORBS=0.1 Subject: Re: LF: Trans Atlantic Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Content-transfer-encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-Spam-Filtered: by PlusNet SpamCORE (v3.00) > > I have posted this email before from James Dean, VE3IQ, the IC liason with > RAC. In it he advises on communication with stations outside of the amateur > service. Thanks Scott - I had not seen that before - and it is an excellent review of the 136 kHz situation. Jim certainly cleared up a lot of the questions, and "un-muddified" the waters. I appreciate getting the copy. John and Warren : I really hope that you are able to clarify your permit and operating conditions as you describe, and am looking forward to the day when 136 might actually be a designated band for two-way operation in North America. Thanks all for the input and comments. Mitch