Return-Path: Received: (qmail 99043 invoked from network); 30 Dec 2004 15:05:53 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ptb-spamcore02.plus.net) (192.168.71.3) by ptb-mailstore01.plus.net with SMTP; 30 Dec 2004 15:05:53 -0000 Received: from mailnull by ptb-spamcore02.plus.net with spamcore-l-b (Exim 4.32; FreeBSD) id 1Ck1pu-000K2k-Cs for dave@picks.force9.co.uk; Thu, 30 Dec 2004 15:03:38 +0000 Received: from [192.168.67.2] (helo=ptb-mxcore02.plus.net) by ptb-spamcore02.plus.net with esmtp (Exim 4.32; FreeBSD) id 1Ck1pu-000K2h-9x for dave@picks.force9.co.uk; Thu, 30 Dec 2004 15:03:34 +0000 Received: from post.thorcom.com ([193.82.116.20]) by ptb-mxcore02.plus.net with esmtp (Exim) id 1Ck1s4-000Fnt-PF for dave@picks.force9.co.uk; Thu, 30 Dec 2004 15:05:48 +0000 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1Ck1r7-0002IC-Q8 for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Thu, 30 Dec 2004 15:04:49 +0000 Received: from [193.82.116.30] (helo=relay.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1Ck1r7-0002I3-BB for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 30 Dec 2004 15:04:49 +0000 Received: from mout2.freenet.de ([194.97.50.155]) by relay.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.41) id 1Ck1r2-0003Pz-SB for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 30 Dec 2004 15:04:49 +0000 Received: from [194.97.55.147] (helo=mx4.freenet.de) by mout2.freenet.de with esmtpa (Exim 4.43) id 1Ck1qn-00012h-2V for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 30 Dec 2004 16:04:29 +0100 Received: from pd9503ed9.dip.t-dialin.net ([217.80.62.217] helo=[192.168.0.200]) by mx4.freenet.de with esmtpsa (ID dl4yhf@freenet.de) (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.43 #13) id 1Ck1qm-0007SG-RK for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 30 Dec 2004 16:04:29 +0100 Message-ID: <41D418FF.20003@freenet.de> Date: Thu, 30 Dec 2004 16:04:31 +0100 From: Wolf DL4YHF User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.9 (Windows/20041103) X-Accept-Language: de-DE, de, en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: RSGB LF Group X-Warning: freenet.de is listed at abuse.rfc-ignorant.org X-SPF-Result: relay.thorcom.net: 194.97.50.155 is neither permitted nor denied by domain of freenet.de X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: autolearn=failed,none Subject: LF: Luxemburg effect (fwd) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-Spam-Filtered: by PlusNet SpamCORE (v3.00) Greetings all, I received the following message from Ivan Bekey who is seeking information on the Luxemburg effect. The subject was discussed on the LF reflector in 2001, but I only found a few old the old message in my own archive. Any information to my address or directly to Ivan would be much appreciated. Thanks in advance, best regards and HNY, Wolfgang "Wolf" DL4YHF . ------------------------------------------------------------------ Wolfgang: I am an electronics engineer in the USA, retired from 19 years at NASA and 31 years in the aerospace industry, and very familiar with ELF through Ka band transmission and reception, though I have never gotten around to getting a ham license. I am particularly interested in information on the "Luxemburg effect" and its causes, including heterodyning and intermodulation by "bad contacts" on the ground as well as ionospheric interactions, and the efficiency of these processes. I got your name by doing a Google search for the Luxemburg effect. Would it be possible for you to direct me to any papers, other technical information, or people that would help me in this area? I would greatly appreciate it. Sincerely Ivan Bekey ibekey@cox.net