Return-Path: Received: (qmail 47846 invoked from network); 13 Dec 2004 10:34:37 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ptb-spamcore02.plus.net) (192.168.71.3) by ptb-mailstore01.plus.net with SMTP; 13 Dec 2004 10:34:37 -0000 Received: from mailnull by ptb-spamcore02.plus.net with spamcore-l-b (Exim 4.32; FreeBSD) id 1Cdnac-000MTb-KH for dave@picks.force9.co.uk; Mon, 13 Dec 2004 10:38:03 +0000 Received: from [192.168.67.1] (helo=ptb-mxcore01.plus.net) by ptb-spamcore02.plus.net with esmtp (Exim 4.32; FreeBSD) id 1Cdnac-000MTJ-2Q for dave@picks.force9.co.uk; Mon, 13 Dec 2004 10:38:02 +0000 Received: from post.thorcom.com ([193.82.116.20]) by ptb-mxcore01.plus.net with esmtp (Exim 4.30; FreeBSD) id 1CdnXH-0004ct-AH for dave@picks.force9.co.uk; Mon, 13 Dec 2004 10:34:35 +0000 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1CdnWW-0007ko-9y for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Mon, 13 Dec 2004 10:33:48 +0000 Received: from [193.82.116.30] (helo=relay.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1CdnWV-0007kf-Ux for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 13 Dec 2004 10:33:47 +0000 Received: from mailhost.ntl.com ([212.250.162.8] helo=mta09-winn.mailhost.ntl.com) by relay.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.41) id 1CdnWP-0008Cr-P4 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 13 Dec 2004 10:33:47 +0000 Received: from aamta02-winn.mailhost.ntl.com ([212.250.162.8]) by mta09-winn.mailhost.ntl.com with ESMTP id <20041213103336.BYMX4623.mta09-winn.mailhost.ntl.com@aamta02-winn.mailhost.ntl.com> for ; Mon, 13 Dec 2004 10:33:36 +0000 Received: from mikedennison ([80.4.116.83]) by aamta02-winn.mailhost.ntl.com with ESMTP id <20041213103336.YPCM20377.aamta02-winn.mailhost.ntl.com@mikedennison> for ; Mon, 13 Dec 2004 10:33:36 +0000 From: "Mike Dennison" To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Date: Mon, 13 Dec 2004 10:33:35 -0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-ID: <41BD6FFF.23705.2B716B@localhost> In-reply-to: <3.0.6.32.20041212163345.00c63b18@magma.ca> References: <41BC4158.9080808@freenet.de> X-mailer: Pegasus Mail for Windows (v4.12a) Content-description: Mail message body X-SPF-Result: relay.thorcom.net: domain of ntlworld.com designates 212.250.162.8 as permitted sender X-Spam-Score: 0.1 (/) X-Spam-Report: autolearn=no,RCVD_IN_SORBS=0.1 Subject: LF: Linear amps for data Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Content-transfer-encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-Spam-Filtered: by PlusNet SpamCORE (v3.00) On 12 Dec 2004 at 16:33, Bill de Carle wrote: > Another way to do this is to use a linear Tx and an audio beacon > message generated by a sound card. This discussion has come full circle since I asked for designs for linear transmitters for data modes. It seems to me that there is still a case for a 'simple' linear Tx to allow newcomers to get on the band without the perceived 'barrier' of learning Morse. Of course, for working DX the penalty of lower efficiency may be a problem, but there are plenty of LF operators who have no interest in DX. One person mentioned the BK Electronics audio amps, though as I recall he had not checked its linearity. These could be a cheap way of generating 100W or so, but I dread to think of the linearity of an amp operated well outside its design frequency. And in case the Thought Police want to have a go, I love Morse and also working DX. It's just that many others do not share this preference. Mike, G3XDV http://lf.apersonalguide.co.uk