Message-ID: <000c01c4ecbc$a87a2340$7fccfc3e@l8p8y6>
From: "hamilton mal" <g3kev.ham@virgin.net>
To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
References: <BDF3801B.46D5%mitch.powell@sympatico.ca> <009d01c4eaf4$38a9fa00$0500a8c0@charter.net> <02e901c4eaf7$9e0b9f40$0201a8c0@private.network> <002d01c4eb56$c53c6180$0500a8c0@charter.net> <001801c4eab9$b4d62940$c8e4fc3e@l8p8y6> <003601c4eb83$64d154e0$3e540150@captbrian>
Date: Mon, 27 Dec 2004 15:01:16 -0000
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: Re: LF: Trans Atlantic
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org


----- Original Message -----
From: "captbrian" <captbrian@ukonline.co.uk>
To: <rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org>
Sent: Sunday, December 26, 2004 7:45 PM
Subject: Re: LF: Trans Atlantic


> Regardless of appellations used in the licence, a station transmitting for
> pure amateur pleasure with no professional/commercial intent is by all
> standards of English usage...

Will you rush out to the RESCUE when they are all locked up !!

>
> an "amateur radio station"...[your honor, My Lord, Judge, Maitre, Ref.  )
> etc.
>
> G3GVB
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: hamilton mal <g3kev.ham@virgin.net>
> To: <rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org>
> Sent: Saturday, December 25, 2004 7:40 PM
> Subject: Re: LF: Trans Atlantic
>
>
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "John Andrews" <w1tag@w1tag.com>
> > To: <rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org>
> > Sent: Sunday, December 26, 2004 2:10 PM
> > Subject: Re: LF: Trans Atlantic
> >
> >
> > > Scott,
> > >
> > > Thanks for the reminder from the VE side. I now remember an earlier
> email
> > > exchange on that subject. And I do agree with your caution in not
> straying
> > > from the purpose of the grant.
> > >
> > > I suppose the same argument could be made from elsewhere. Has anyone
> > plumbed
> > > the depths of U.K. officialdom on the subject of communicating with
> > > non-Amateur services? Or is it best just to leave such things alone?
> > >
> > > The problem is actually not with making the 2-way contact; it is with
> the
> > > resulting publicity! If such news were confined to a small group of
> > > experimenters, nothing would probably come from it.
> > >
> > > John Andrews
> >
> > Hi John and Group
> > My licence EI2AE says Experimenters Licence and not Radio Amateur
Licence.
> I
> > expect all EI licences say the same.
> > Maybe it has been changed to accommodate recripocal licensing
arrangements
> > with other countries that specify Radio Amateur Licence. The main point
> > being that anyone can interwork between EI and the rest of the world, so
> by
> > the same logic I do not think there would be a problem in the UK working
> an
> > experimental type station in the USA or elswhere.
> > The problem might be at your end if it specifically states only inter
PART
> > 15 contacts.
> > So you take a chance or you  dont!!!!!!!! If we were all closed down
would
> > it make that much difference!!
> > de Mal/G3KEV
> >
> >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
>
>