Return-Path: Received: (qmail 90393 invoked from network); 17 Nov 2004 09:20:01 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ptb-spamcore02.plus.net) (192.168.71.3) by ptb-mailstore01.plus.net with SMTP; 17 Nov 2004 09:20:01 -0000 Received: from mailnull by ptb-spamcore02.plus.net with spamcore-l-b (Exim 4.32; FreeBSD) id 1CULxx-000L2p-Li for dave@picks.force9.co.uk; Wed, 17 Nov 2004 09:19:10 +0000 Received: from [192.168.67.2] (helo=ptb-mxcore02.plus.net) by ptb-spamcore02.plus.net with esmtp (Exim 4.32; FreeBSD) id 1CULxw-000L2b-TR for dave@picks.force9.co.uk; Wed, 17 Nov 2004 09:19:05 +0000 Received: from post.thorcom.com ([193.82.116.20]) by ptb-mxcore02.plus.net with esmtp (Exim) id 1CULyl-000GvS-C9 for dave@picks.force9.co.uk; Wed, 17 Nov 2004 09:19:55 +0000 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1CULy9-0006Wj-DO for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Wed, 17 Nov 2004 09:19:17 +0000 Received: from [193.82.116.30] (helo=relay.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1CULy9-0006Wa-1H for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 17 Nov 2004 09:19:17 +0000 Received: from [194.203.13.70] (helo=viruswall.mmsuk.co.uk) by relay.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.41) id 1CULy3-0007H3-Vn for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 17 Nov 2004 09:19:17 +0000 Received: by mms12031.pth.uk.astrium.corp with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21) id ; Wed, 17 Nov 2004 09:19:05 -0000 Message-ID: From: "OSBORN, Chris" To: "LF Group (E-mail)" Date: Wed, 17 Nov 2004 09:19:08 -0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21) X-SPF-Result: relay.thorcom.net: 194.203.13.70 is neither permitted nor denied by domain of astrium.eads.net X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: autolearn=no, Subject: LF: Loading Coils Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1; format=flowed X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-Spam-Filtered: by PlusNet SpamCORE (v3.00) Content-transfer-encoding: 8bit Hello LF Group Many thanks for all comments and advice - most interesting. I drilled out the wooden dowels on the loading coil and replaced them with lengths of 15 mm plastic water pipe. I was unable to obtain plastic rod at short notice and my XYL wouldn't let me have her knitting needles ! The pipe was not really rigid enough and bent slightly but was sufficient to prove the experiment. With this new arrangement I obtained my personal best Q of about 250.. Placing the new coil in the aerial circuit made a slight improvement to the aerial current - from about 1.2 A to 1.5 A I would have thought that as most of the losses were in the coil a bigger current improvement would have been achieved. I share my office with some young electronics engineers and was surprised that they know very little about RF inductors or Q factor. It must be a dying art ! My next improvement will be to raise the 'droopy' end of my aerial, presently at a height of about 5 metres Unfortunately two neighbours' telephone wires pass over my garden where the mast was to be situated. Any suggestions - should I go over the wires or keep well clear of them and cut a length off the aerial ? Presumably I can't get the phone company to move their wires !! 73 Chris G3XIZ This email is for the intended addressee only. If you have received it in error then you must not use, retain, disseminate or otherwise deal with it. Please notify the sender by return email. The views of the author may not necessarily constitute the views of EADS Astrium Limited. Nothing in this email shall bind EADS Astrium Limited in any contract or obligation. EADS Astrium Limited, Registered in England and Wales No. 2449259 Registered Office: Gunnels Wood Road, Stevenage, Hertfordshire, SG1 2AS, England