Return-Path: Received: (qmail 28766 invoked from network); 8 Nov 2004 21:04:43 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ptb-spamcore01.plus.net) (192.168.71.1) by ptb-mailstore01.plus.net with SMTP; 8 Nov 2004 21:04:43 -0000 Received: from mailnull by ptb-spamcore01.plus.net with spamcore-l-b (Exim 4.32; FreeBSD) id 1CRGwl-000H0X-N4 for dave@picks.force9.co.uk; Mon, 08 Nov 2004 21:21:09 +0000 Received: from [192.168.67.1] (helo=ptb-mxcore01.plus.net) by ptb-spamcore01.plus.net with esmtp (Exim 4.32; FreeBSD) id 1CRGwk-000Gzp-1Y for dave@picks.force9.co.uk; Mon, 08 Nov 2004 21:21:06 +0000 Received: from post.thorcom.com ([193.82.116.20]) by ptb-mxcore01.plus.net with esmtp (Exim 4.30; FreeBSD) id 1CRGgm-000NtZ-1O for dave@picks.force9.co.uk; Mon, 08 Nov 2004 21:04:36 +0000 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1CRGfN-00078d-DV for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Mon, 08 Nov 2004 21:03:09 +0000 Received: from [193.82.116.30] (helo=relay.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1CRGfN-00078U-2k for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 08 Nov 2004 21:03:09 +0000 Received: from mailout10.sul.t-online.com ([194.25.134.21]) by relay.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.41) id 1CRGfJ-0005WS-FU for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 08 Nov 2004 21:03:09 +0000 Received: from fwd07.aul.t-online.de by mailout10.sul.t-online.com with smtp id 1CRGfI-0004rA-00; Mon, 08 Nov 2004 22:03:04 +0100 Received: from (bLnY36ZcZeMdTlcUOtyUs6ykMEXrX-cNDFzGo3RP2I-KGQ4hE74xUP@[217.251.198.28]) by fwd07.sul.t-online.com with smtp id 1CRGf4-0qPSwC0; Mon, 8 Nov 2004 22:02:50 +0100 From: jannsen <0482183881-0001@t-online.de> To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <9f.517a5894.2ec0f2f6@aol.com> X-Mailer: T-Online eMail 2.34 MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Mon, 8 Nov 2004 22:02:50 +0100 Message-ID: <1CRGf4-0qPSwC0@fwd07.sul.t-online.com> X-ID: bLnY36ZcZeMdTlcUOtyUs6ykMEXrX-cNDFzGo3RP2I-KGQ4hE74xUP X-TOI-MSGID: 12a21f72-1c38-4b84-95b3-1e71801c9693 X-SPF-Result: relay.thorcom.net: 194.25.134.21 is neither permitted nor denied by domain of t-online.de X-Spam-Score: 2.8 (++) X-Spam-Report: autolearn=no,FROM_ENDS_IN_NUMS=0.869,FROM_STARTS_WITH_NUMS=1.574,SARE_HEAD_XID=0.305,TW_GV=0.077 Subject: Re: LF: accumulator - off topic Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: ** X-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.4 required=5.0 tests=FROM_ENDS_IN_NUMS, FROM_STARTS_WITH_NUMS autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-Spam-Filtered: by PlusNet SpamCORE (v3.00) G4gvw@aol.com schrieb: > Hi Uwe, > There is also an argument which suggests that a very small current > maintenance charge is beneficial with some lead acids. Best bet to to contact > the > manufacturer (if known) for definitive advice. > > 73 de Pat g4gvw > thanks Pat vy 73 Uwe