Message-ID: <1100720170.419ba82ad3568@webmail.ukonline.net>
Date: Wed, 17 Nov 2004 19:36:10 +0000
From: captbrian <captbrian@ukonline.co.uk>
To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
References: <000001c4ccbc$218c5760$6405a8c0@MJUSonyLaptop> <004501c4ccbe$b4515c60$fad5fea9@smiley> <419B8E60.3090904@zen.co.uk>
In-Reply-To: <419B8E60.3090904@zen.co.uk>
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Internet Messaging Program (IMP) 3.2
Subject: Re: LF: Re: RE: Telephone wires
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org

Is the space above my front garden a 'free-for-all' then ?.

If my aerial wires tangle with their beastly 'phone wires , will it become a 
matter of whose wire-cutters get there first.? 

LF needs are about to have me string stuff up in front of the house where 
previously HF stuff has been firmly behind it.

Bryan

who will Quoting Stewart Bryant <zen27607@zen.co.uk>:

> You might want to be quick though.
> 
> I understand that the farmers are about to inundate the power and
> phone people with pole movement demands.
> 
> - Stewart
> 
> Tracey Gardner wrote:
> 
> >BT doesn't need a wayleave to have wires "flying" over your land, poles
> >however are a different matter
> >
> >73s Tracey
> >
> >  
> >
> >>>neighbours telephone wires across my garden are an upcoming hazard for
> >>>      
> >>>
> >me
> >  
> >
> >>>also.
> >>>
> >>>      
> >>>
> >
> >
> >
> >  
> >
> 
> 
> 


-- 


----------------------------------------------
This mail sent through http://www.ukonline.net