Return-Path: Received: (qmail 69392 invoked from network); 18 Oct 2004 22:58:16 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ptb-spamcore01.plus.net) (192.168.71.1) by ptb-mailstore02.plus.net with SMTP; 18 Oct 2004 22:58:16 -0000 Received: from mailnull by ptb-spamcore01.plus.net with spamcore-l-b (Exim 4.32; FreeBSD) id 1CJgfG-000P7i-7N for dave@picks.force9.co.uk; Tue, 19 Oct 2004 00:11:43 +0100 Received: from [192.168.67.1] (helo=ptb-mxcore01.plus.net) by ptb-spamcore01.plus.net with esmtp (Exim 4.32; FreeBSD) id 1CJgfG-000P7f-51 for dave@picks.force9.co.uk; Tue, 19 Oct 2004 00:11:42 +0100 Received: from post.thorcom.com ([193.82.116.20]) by ptb-mxcore01.plus.net with esmtp (Exim 4.30; FreeBSD) id 1CJgSF-0002VC-O7 for dave@picks.force9.co.uk; Mon, 18 Oct 2004 22:58:15 +0000 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1CJgQO-0003dN-Am for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Mon, 18 Oct 2004 23:56:20 +0100 Received: from [193.82.116.30] (helo=relay.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1CJgQN-0003dE-UL for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 18 Oct 2004 23:56:19 +0100 Received: from mailout02.sul.t-online.com ([194.25.134.17]) by relay.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.41) id 1CJgQK-0007Fg-Hk for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 18 Oct 2004 23:56:19 +0100 Received: from fwd01.aul.t-online.de by mailout02.sul.t-online.com with smtp id 1CJgQJ-0002FR-02; Tue, 19 Oct 2004 00:56:15 +0200 Received: from 127.0.0.1 (VygiPUZBYeLnOM3JTMTsXRa5eDVIaUlwwT5jQcNpuG1uGlriXCTFwE@[217.250.34.239]) by fwd01.sul.t-online.com with smtp id 1CJgQF-1vqIWe0; Tue, 19 Oct 2004 00:56:11 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 From: Hans-Joachim Brandt To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Mailer: T-Online eMail 4.111 Date: 18 Oct 2004 22:55 GMT Message-ID: <1CJgQF-1vqIWe0@fwd01.sul.t-online.com> X-ID: VygiPUZBYeLnOM3JTMTsXRa5eDVIaUlwwT5jQcNpuG1uGlriXCTFwE X-TOI-MSGID: a1eba630-c21d-46f7-80cc-dd5c01772cb8 X-SPF-Result: relay.thorcom.net: 194.25.134.17 is neither permitted nor denied by domain of t-online.de X-Spam-Score: 0.5 (/) X-Spam-Report: autolearn=no,RCVD_IN_SORBS=0.1,SARE_HEAD_XID=0.305,TW_XI=0.077 Subject: Re: LF: RE: 1 W ERP on 137 in Germany Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-Spam-Filtered: by PlusNet SpamCORE (v3.00) Dear Walter, thank You for this information, it sounds reasonable. 73 Ha-Jo, DJ1ZB "Walter Staubach" schrieb: > Dear Hajo and All, > people continue the story about this so-called historical voting: > The English language won by a one-vote majority. Balsam for the German soul. > But sorry, the historical truth is - this voting for an all-american > language never took place. Most regions spoke English from the beginnung, > few spoke German. > Please read: > Walter Krämer / Götz Trenkler: Lexikon der populären Irrtümer, Eichborn > Verlag, Seite 68 > Nevertheless: I like 1W ERP > 73 Walter DJ2LF > > > -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- > Von: Hans-Joachim Brandt > An: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org > Datum: Montag, 18. Oktober 2004 15:20 > Betreff: Re: LF: RE: 1 W ERP on 137 in Germany > > > >Dear all, > > > >I guess I have to place an excuse for all germans: We are not using such > long expressions in our daily life or normal literature - but sri, our > administrations have a strong tendency to use them! > > > >And of course those guys of DARC in contact with administrations have to > align to those word forming practices. > > > >Normal german grammar even contains a recommendation that, if more than > four substantives are combined to a new single word, a dash should be > inserted after the first two substantives, to gain better visibility of the > content of the long word (but there are even five basic substantives > involved here): > > > >Frequenzbereichs-Zuweisungsplan-Verordnung > > > >I think we all should be glad that in the historical voting in the young > USA whether english or german should be chosen as the common language, > english had won. > > > >OK? > > > >73 Ha-Jo, Brandt > > > >"Alberto di Bene" schrieb: > >> Dave Pick wrote: > >> > >> >> A 40 letter word?! How much would that score in Scrabble? ;-) > >> >> > >> > > >> This one would score even more : :-) > >> > Frequenznormaltemperaturverschiebungsbereichszuweisungsplanuntersuchungsvero > rdnungskommission > >> > >> 73 Alberto I2PHD > >> > >> > >> > >> > > > > > > > > > > >