Return-Path: Received: (qmail 29595 invoked from network); 6 Oct 2004 06:57:14 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ptb-spamcore02.plus.net) (192.168.71.3) by ptb-mailstore01.plus.net with SMTP; 6 Oct 2004 06:57:14 -0000 Received: from mailnull by ptb-spamcore02.plus.net with spamcore-l-b (Exim 4.32; FreeBSD) id 1CF5pR-000EIh-FW for dave@picks.force9.co.uk; Wed, 06 Oct 2004 08:03:13 +0100 Received: from [192.168.67.1] (helo=ptb-mxcore01.plus.net) by ptb-spamcore02.plus.net with esmtp (Exim 4.32; FreeBSD) id 1CF5pR-000EIe-D2 for dave@picks.force9.co.uk; Wed, 06 Oct 2004 08:03:13 +0100 Received: from post.thorcom.com ([193.82.116.20]) by ptb-mxcore01.plus.net with esmtp (Exim 4.30; FreeBSD) id 1CF5jd-000HxZ-FN for dave@picks.force9.co.uk; Wed, 06 Oct 2004 06:57:13 +0000 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1CF5j0-0002ZZ-QT for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Wed, 06 Oct 2004 07:56:34 +0100 Received: from [193.82.116.30] (helo=relay.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1CF5j0-0002ZQ-Er for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 06 Oct 2004 07:56:34 +0100 Received: from imo-m17.mx.aol.com ([64.12.138.207]) by relay.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.41) id 1CF5ix-00056D-Aj for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 06 Oct 2004 07:56:34 +0100 Received: from G0MRF@aol.com by imo-m17.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v37_r3.7.) id l.146.359454b1 (24895) for ; Wed, 6 Oct 2004 02:56:17 -0400 (EDT) From: G0MRF@aol.com Message-ID: <146.359454b1.2e94f111@aol.com> Date: Wed, 6 Oct 2004 02:56:17 EDT To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: 9.0 for Windows sub 5003 X-SPF-Result: relay.thorcom.net: domain of aol.com designates 64.12.138.207 as permitted sender X-Spam-Score: 1.1 (+) X-Spam-Report: autolearn=no,HTML_30_40=0.809,HTML_MESSAGE=0.001,NO_REAL_NAME=0.285 Subject: Re: LF: VO1NA last night Content-Type: text/html; charset=windows-1252 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.1 required=5.0 tests=HTML_30_40,HTML_MESSAGE, NO_REAL_NAME autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-Spam-Filtered: by PlusNet SpamCORE (v3.00) Content-transfer-encoding: 8bit
In a message dated 05/10/2004 15:11:00 GMT Standard Time, wolff.h@t-online.de writes:
Signal of VO1NA was much poorer than the previous nights here in
JO52ho. Copied the full callsign 2300-0030 UTC and 0200-0530 UTC.
The attached screenshot contains 2300-0030 UTC. Strongest signal was
here 0200-0300 UTC with some 5wpm "blur" on the QRSS30 screen also.
Sunrise was here around 0525 UTC (0725 MESZ).

Hartmut Wolff
That's a very impressive period of propagation!
 
One question, and sorry if I've missed the answer in previous mails.....Why is the call in the QRSS image  KO1NA  ?
 
73
 
David