Return-Path: Received: (qmail 20100 invoked from network); 20 Sep 2004 16:15:51 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ptb-spamcore02.plus.net) (192.168.71.3) by ptb-mailstore02.plus.net with SMTP; 20 Sep 2004 16:15:51 -0000 Received: from mailnull by ptb-spamcore02.plus.net with spamcore-l-b (Exim 4.32; FreeBSD) id 1C9Qsm-0004yO-LI for dave@picks.force9.co.uk; Mon, 20 Sep 2004 17:19:17 +0100 Received: from [192.168.67.2] (helo=ptb-mxcore02.plus.net) by ptb-spamcore02.plus.net with esmtp (Exim 4.32; FreeBSD) id 1C9Qsl-0004y5-Rz for dave@picks.force9.co.uk; Mon, 20 Sep 2004 17:19:16 +0100 Received: from post.thorcom.com ([193.82.116.20]) by ptb-mxcore02.plus.net with esmtp (Exim) id 1C9QpR-000KH0-Rm for dave@picks.force9.co.uk; Mon, 20 Sep 2004 16:15:49 +0000 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1C9Qoq-0000gO-UQ for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Mon, 20 Sep 2004 17:15:12 +0100 Received: from [193.82.116.30] (helo=relay.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1C9Qoq-0000gF-IX for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 20 Sep 2004 17:15:12 +0100 Received: from mailout08.sul.t-online.com ([194.25.134.20]) by relay.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.41) id 1C9Qom-0000bs-M5 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 20 Sep 2004 17:15:12 +0100 Received: from fwd01.aul.t-online.de by mailout08.sul.t-online.com with smtp id 1C9Qol-0006MY-0C; Mon, 20 Sep 2004 18:15:07 +0200 Received: from (TD86w+ZrZeK7de9b2DNKL9gUN1frU2ebp4qPjQi0+5xJ8uH5KcW4EL@[217.251.198.57]) by fwd01.sul.t-online.com with smtp id 1C9Qoi-1J0pLE0; Mon, 20 Sep 2004 18:15:04 +0200 From: jannsen <0482183881-0001@t-online.de> To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <001e01c49be1$4fbb7a50$6802a8c0@Leo> <70329395004.20040918090437@dx.ru> <10335026458.20040920183618@dx.ru> X-Mailer: T-Online eMail 2.34 MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Mon, 20 Sep 2004 18:15:04 +0200 Message-ID: <1C9Qoi-1J0pLE0@fwd01.sul.t-online.com> X-ID: TD86w+ZrZeK7de9b2DNKL9gUN1frU2ebp4qPjQi0+5xJ8uH5KcW4EL X-TOI-MSGID: 1f017596-774f-41ca-bdca-30a56d29b17e X-SPF-Result: relay.thorcom.net: 194.25.134.20 is neither permitted nor denied by domain of t-online.de X-Spam-Score: 2.8 (++) X-Spam-Report: autolearn=no,FROM_ENDS_IN_NUMS=0.869,FROM_STARTS_WITH_NUMS=1.574,SARE_HEAD_XID=0.305,TW_DV=0.077 Subject: Re: LF: Re: New season start Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: ** X-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.4 required=5.0 tests=FROM_ENDS_IN_NUMS, FROM_STARTS_WITH_NUMS autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-Spam-Filtered: by PlusNet SpamCORE (v3.00) Ed Lesnichy schrieb: > Dear LF enthusiasts, > > I successfully have devoted saturday day to restoration LF setup: > has made more effective and strong TX aerial, has adjusted and has checked > up new coil & PA. Unfortunately it was not possible to make the good RX ANT > (agricultural works around of a tower were not finished yet) > I used on reception the periodically big quad on 160Í - very large > level of QRM on the tower because of the local equipment. > I regret about the mistake in dates and time of a Marcelo's LW2ETU > beacon and made my beacon in his time ;-( > TNX to all for the msgs on reception of my beacon. Also has received > the reports from Russia and Ukraine. > I saw some QRSS and DFCW signals, but has made only 1 QSO with Tom DK1IS > QRSS/DFCW abt 2230z -> bad RX ant ;-( > > I believe, that Marcelo LW2ETU should make longer beacons (QRRS60 or 120) > in the near future (end of September - October) - I also can make long > beverage to this time to LU > > 73! Ed RU6LA ed@dx.ru http://136.73.ru > > Hi Ed, bad RX ant, but ur TX ant seems to be super. pse will you give us a specification of the new ant and the new PA? and secondly, who did receive you beside dj8wx? it would be of interest because of the condx. tks in advnc regards Uwe/dj8wx