Return-Path: Received: (qmail 19384 invoked from network); 16 Aug 2004 21:10:47 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ptb-spamcore02.plus.net) (192.168.71.3) by ptb-mailstore02.plus.net with SMTP; 16 Aug 2004 21:10:47 -0000 Received: from mailnull by ptb-spamcore02.plus.net with spamcore-l-b (Exim 4.32; FreeBSD) id 1BwopE-00087d-B6 for dave@picks.force9.co.uk; Mon, 16 Aug 2004 22:15:29 +0100 Received: from [192.168.67.1] (helo=ptb-mxcore01.plus.net) by ptb-spamcore02.plus.net with esmtp (Exim 4.32; FreeBSD) id 1BwopE-00087a-96 for dave@picks.force9.co.uk; Mon, 16 Aug 2004 22:15:28 +0100 Received: from post.thorcom.com ([193.82.116.20]) by ptb-mxcore01.plus.net with esmtp (Exim 4.30; FreeBSD) id 1Bwokg-00075h-ET for dave@picks.force9.co.uk; Mon, 16 Aug 2004 21:10:46 +0000 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1Bwojh-0005t9-QP for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Mon, 16 Aug 2004 22:09:45 +0100 Received: from [193.82.116.30] (helo=relay.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1Bwojh-0005t0-FI for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 16 Aug 2004 22:09:45 +0100 Received: from mailout.zetnet.co.uk ([194.247.47.231]) by relay.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.41) id 1Bwojd-0007AA-Qm for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 16 Aug 2004 22:09:45 +0100 Received: from irwell.zetnet.co.uk ([194.247.47.48] helo=zetnet.co.uk) by mailout.zetnet.co.uk with esmtp (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 1Bwojd-0002Tu-00 for ; Mon, 16 Aug 2004 22:09:41 +0100 Received: from john-b5a82ea1a4 (bts-0219.dialup.zetnet.co.uk [194.247.48.219]) by zetnet.co.uk (8.12.11/8.12.11/Debian-5) with ESMTP id i7GL9bcN000849 for ; Mon, 16 Aug 2004 22:09:40 +0100 Message-ID: <200408162209400824.0BCABED7@mail.zetnet.co.uk> In-Reply-To: References: X-Mailer: Courier Evaluation 3.50.00.09.1098 (http://www.rosecitysoftware.com) (K) Date: Mon, 16 Aug 2004 22:09:40 +0100 From: "John Rabson" To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Mime-Version: 1.0 X-SPF-Result: relay.thorcom.net: 194.247.47.231 is neither permitted nor denied by domain of zetnet.co.uk X-Spam-Score: 0.1 (/) X-Spam-Report: autolearn=no,RCVD_IN_SORBS=0.1 Subject: LF: Re: G9AED (was 137 khz acty) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-Spam-Filtered: by PlusNet SpamCORE (v3.00) They previously used it from the Crystal Palace tx in London. John G3PAI *********** REPLY SEPARATOR *********** On 16/08/2004 at 18:39 Gary - G4WGT wrote: >Hi LF Group, > >My memories of G9+++ call signs were the ones allocated to companies >operating in broadcast television ie. Belling & Lee had the call sign G9AED >when carring out live testing of the Band 3 television installation for >commercial television on Winter Hill (north west UK), I worked in domestic >TV & radio in those days. I also have a QSL card to prove it. HI HI. > >Regards > >Gary - G4WGT. > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org >[mailto:owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org]On Behalf Of G4gvw@aol.com > Sent: 15 August 2004 22:42 > To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org > Subject: Re: LF: Re: Re: Re: Re: 137 khz acty > > > Oh gaaaawd! > > Do we really have to do this? > > I once had a G9+++ (and NO it wasn't G9BF of SWM fame) >But................SO WHAT !!! > > This is AMATEUR RADIO not the Olympic Games! > > (There might still be some out there who understand the circumstances >under which such calls were issued) >--- >Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. >Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). >Version: 6.0.737 / Virus Database: 491 - Release Date: 11/08/2004