Return-Path: Received: (qmail 21268 invoked from network); 17 Aug 2004 22:13:06 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ptb-spamcore01.plus.net) (192.168.71.1) by ptb-mailstore01.plus.net with SMTP; 17 Aug 2004 22:13:06 -0000 Received: from mailnull by ptb-spamcore01.plus.net with spamcore-l-b (Exim 4.32; FreeBSD) id 1BxCGk-000MQZ-UF for dave@picks.force9.co.uk; Tue, 17 Aug 2004 23:17:27 +0100 Received: from [192.168.67.1] (helo=ptb-mxcore01.plus.net) by ptb-spamcore01.plus.net with esmtp (Exim 4.32; FreeBSD) id 1BxCGk-000MQW-S5 for dave@picks.force9.co.uk; Tue, 17 Aug 2004 23:17:26 +0100 Received: from post.thorcom.com ([193.82.116.20]) by ptb-mxcore01.plus.net with esmtp (Exim 4.30; FreeBSD) id 1BxCCX-000DAX-Nm for dave@picks.force9.co.uk; Tue, 17 Aug 2004 22:13:05 +0000 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1BxCBr-0003vU-Vx for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Tue, 17 Aug 2004 23:12:23 +0100 Received: from [193.82.116.30] (helo=relay.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1BxCBr-0003vL-Kr for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Tue, 17 Aug 2004 23:12:23 +0100 Received: from mailout11.sul.t-online.com ([194.25.134.85]) by relay.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.41) id 1BxCBo-0005vy-7z for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Tue, 17 Aug 2004 23:12:23 +0100 Received: from fwd06.aul.t-online.de by mailout11.sul.t-online.com with smtp id 1BxCBn-00013f-00; Wed, 18 Aug 2004 00:12:19 +0200 Received: from (r1dWcYZ-YeSWvD9j4hq9E8dRKikom3Dn7qp9JgkjfdSSZ0pPBW0407@[217.251.191.102]) by fwd06.sul.t-online.com with smtp id 1BxCBe-1I39jE0; Wed, 18 Aug 2004 00:12:10 +0200 From: jannsen <0482183881-0001@t-online.de> To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <4121DDAF.8080307@usa.net> X-Mailer: T-Online eMail 2.34 MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Wed, 18 Aug 2004 00:12:10 +0200 Message-ID: <1BxCBe-1I39jE0@fwd06.sul.t-online.com> X-ID: r1dWcYZ-YeSWvD9j4hq9E8dRKikom3Dn7qp9JgkjfdSSZ0pPBW0407 X-SPF-Result: relay.thorcom.net: 194.25.134.85 is neither permitted nor denied by domain of t-online.de X-Spam-Score: 2.6 (++) X-Spam-Report: autolearn=no,FROM_ENDS_IN_NUMS=0.869,FROM_STARTS_WITH_NUMS=1.574,SARE_HEAD_XID=0.2 Subject: LF: egg/chicken/cat Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: ** X-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.4 required=5.0 tests=FROM_ENDS_IN_NUMS, FROM_STARTS_WITH_NUMS autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-Spam-Filtered: by PlusNet SpamCORE (v3.00) Hi Alberto and others, you all discuss in a manner not allowed according to Aristoteles logic. please make a step further. blow up the circulus vitiosus, forget the collapses and be Faustical: the next questions are: (egg, chicken and cat meet the interaction requirements) was it a chicken or was it a cock creeping out of a supposed first created egg brooded out by a cat? if it was a cock brooded out by a cat , did that cat like that cock? regards Uwe