Return-Path: Received: (qmail 20743 invoked from network); 13 Aug 2004 12:40:13 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ptb-spamcore02.plus.net) (192.168.71.3) by ptb-mailstore01.plus.net with SMTP; 13 Aug 2004 12:40:13 -0000 Received: from mailnull by ptb-spamcore02.plus.net with spamcore-l-b (Exim 4.32; FreeBSD) id 1BvbPx-000Bhk-BU for dave@picks.force9.co.uk; Fri, 13 Aug 2004 13:44:22 +0100 Received: from [192.168.67.2] (helo=ptb-mxcore02.plus.net) by ptb-spamcore02.plus.net with esmtp (Exim 4.32; FreeBSD) id 1BvbPx-000Bhh-8s for dave@picks.force9.co.uk; Fri, 13 Aug 2004 13:44:21 +0100 Received: from post.thorcom.com ([193.82.116.20]) by ptb-mxcore02.plus.net with esmtp (Exim) id 1BvbLw-000Dmp-IH for dave@picks.force9.co.uk; Fri, 13 Aug 2004 12:40:12 +0000 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1BvbLT-00069y-O6 for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Fri, 13 Aug 2004 13:39:43 +0100 Received: from [193.82.116.30] (helo=relay.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1BvbLT-00069p-BJ for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 13 Aug 2004 13:39:43 +0100 Received: from mail.libertysurf.net ([213.36.80.91]) by relay.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.41) id 1BvbLP-0000ag-Hn for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 13 Aug 2004 13:39:43 +0100 Received: from jboi0045tiscali (213.36.30.55) by mail.libertysurf.net (6.5.036) id 411AED1700373946 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 13 Aug 2004 14:39:32 +0200 Message-ID: <000001c48132$7e2ad260$371e24d5@jboi0045tiscali> From: "F6CWN" To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <002601c480a7$e7ea4400$1600a8c0@hasbro.co.uk> <001501c480ad$373a9460$0fa424d5@jboi0045tiscali> <004501c480b3$58654670$1600a8c0@hasbro.co.uk> <008801c480cc$25700ac0$0fa424d5@jboi0045tiscali> <001d01c4810b$bb41ede0$0e540150@captbrian> <000901c4811d$6730c2a0$da0024d5@jboi0045tiscali> <009101c48125$643b56c0$0e540150@captbrian> Date: Fri, 13 Aug 2004 12:31:47 -0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1437 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1441 X-SPF-Result: relay.thorcom.net: 213.36.80.91 is neither permitted nor denied by domain of tiscali.fr X-Spam-Score: 0.3 (/) X-Spam-Report: autolearn=no,HTML_50_60=0.183,HTML_MESSAGE=0.001,RCVD_IN_SORBS=0.1 Subject: LF: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Re:_Re:_Re=B2:_Tune_the_loop...?= Content-Type: text/html; charset=windows-1252 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.2 required=5.0 tests=HTML_50_60,HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-Spam-Filtered: by PlusNet SpamCORE (v3.00) Content-transfer-encoding: 8bit
13./08/2004   1211z
 
Hi Bryan,
 
I also used a loop with a second loop inside, then i receive very well a submarine transmitter very close...
The mutual coupling between the low Z pick up loop and the "RX" loop elarge the BW...They are no miracle!
Maybe the loop # 142857 will be perfect, wait and see!  :-))
 
 Jeff / F6CWN
----- Original Message -----
From: captbrian
To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Sent: Friday, August 13, 2004 11:05 AM
Subject: LF: Re: ReČ: Tune the loop...

Merci,
 I wonder why you don't use the commonplace  (for higher frequencies ) small  loop inside the bigger one for impedance transformation and variable coupling?. Notice I am learning from others' mistakes before making my own loop  :-))
 
Bryan G3GVB