Return-Path: Received: (qmail 44061 invoked from network); 24 Jul 2004 08:21:17 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ptb-spamcore02.plus.net) (192.168.71.3) by ptb-mailstore01.plus.net with SMTP; 24 Jul 2004 08:21:17 -0000 Received: from mailnull by ptb-spamcore02.plus.net with spamcore-l-b (Exim 4.32; FreeBSD) id 1BoHnC-0003La-MY for dave@picks.force9.co.uk; Sat, 24 Jul 2004 09:22:07 +0100 Received: from [192.168.67.1] (helo=ptb-mxcore01.plus.net) by ptb-spamcore02.plus.net with esmtp (Exim 4.32; FreeBSD) id 1BoHnC-0003LQ-K5 for dave@picks.force9.co.uk; Sat, 24 Jul 2004 09:22:06 +0100 Received: from post.thorcom.com ([193.82.116.20]) by ptb-mxcore01.plus.net with esmtp (Exim 4.30; FreeBSD) id 1BoHmN-000Kaq-7d for dave@picks.force9.co.uk; Sat, 24 Jul 2004 08:21:15 +0000 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1BoHlY-0002cx-HW for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Sat, 24 Jul 2004 09:20:24 +0100 Received: from [193.82.116.30] (helo=relay.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1BoHlY-0002cm-6h for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sat, 24 Jul 2004 09:20:24 +0100 Received: from mx.omskcity.com ([81.176.48.2] helo=astral.omskcity.com) by relay.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1BoHlU-0000wW-BR for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sat, 24 Jul 2004 09:20:24 +0100 Received: from noname.nodomain.nowhere (host196.m02.dial.sotline.ru [81.176.51.196]) by astral.omskcity.com (8.x.x) with ESMTP id i6O8CeLi002801 for ; Sat, 24 Jul 2004 15:12:41 +0700 (OSS) Received: from localhost (fitec@localhost) by noname.nodomain.nowhere (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id OAA00266 for ; Sat, 24 Jul 2004 14:27:00 GMT X-Authentication-Warning: noname.nodomain.nowhere: fitec owned process doing -bs Date: Sat, 24 Jul 2004 14:26:59 +0000 (GMT) From: "Alexander S. Yurkov" To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org In-Reply-To: <41012684.5030501@g3ysx.org.uk> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: autolearn=no, Subject: Re: LF: Re: Loops v Verticals Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-Spam-Filtered: by PlusNet SpamCORE (v3.00) Content-transfer-encoding: 8bit On Fri, 23 Jul 2004, Stewart Bryant wrote: > > However anomolous results can also be of interest. For example, it is > not uncommon for > researchers to sweep minor, irritating, results under the table. Any anomalous results are of grate interest! But usualy it is due to experimental mistake. It is very rare when it is real evidence that common theorys should be reworking. So one should be very carefull when requre to modify the well testing theory. This is the only point... 73 de RA9MB/Alex http://www.qsl.net/ra9mb