Return-Path: Received: (qmail 87911 invoked from network); 21 Jul 2004 08:53:14 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ptb-spamcore01.plus.net) (192.168.71.1) by ptb-mailstore01.plus.net with SMTP; 21 Jul 2004 08:53:14 -0000 Received: from [192.168.67.2] (helo=ptb-mxcore02.plus.net) by ptb-spamcore01.plus.net with esmtp (Exim 4.32; FreeBSD) id 1BnCqy-000IAX-G8 for dave@picks.force9.co.uk; Wed, 21 Jul 2004 09:53:32 +0100 Received: from post.thorcom.com ([193.82.116.20]) by ptb-mxcore02.plus.net with esmtp (Exim) id 1BnCqe-000EOz-KB for dave@picks.force9.co.uk; Wed, 21 Jul 2004 08:53:12 +0000 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1BnCqC-0008Cw-TW for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Wed, 21 Jul 2004 09:52:44 +0100 Received: from [193.82.116.30] (helo=relay.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1BnCqC-0008Cn-It for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 21 Jul 2004 09:52:44 +0100 Received: from mx.omskcity.com ([81.176.48.2] helo=astral.omskcity.com) by relay.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1BnCq8-0005aY-OM for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 21 Jul 2004 09:52:44 +0100 Received: from noname.nodomain.nowhere (host196.m02.dial.sotline.ru [81.176.51.196]) by astral.omskcity.com (8.x.x) with ESMTP id i6L8nPPQ013495 for ; Wed, 21 Jul 2004 15:49:26 +0700 (OSS) Received: from localhost (fitec@localhost) by noname.nodomain.nowhere (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id PAA00737 for ; Wed, 21 Jul 2004 15:03:41 GMT X-Authentication-Warning: noname.nodomain.nowhere: fitec owned process doing -bs Date: Wed, 21 Jul 2004 15:03:40 +0000 (GMT) From: "Alexander S. Yurkov" To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org In-Reply-To: <002f01c46df8$a3fcfec0$72cdfc3e@l8p8y6> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: autolearn=no, Subject: Re: LF: Loops v Verticals Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-Spam-Filtered: by PlusNet SpamCORE (v3.00) Content-transfer-encoding: 8bit On Tue, 20 Jul 2004, hamilton mal wrote: > For those that do not know. Research around Europe has shown that VERTICALS > are the only antennas suitable for Transmitting on LF. Loops are fine > for Receiving, little or large but the bigger the better. Who has ever > heard of a LF broadcasting station using loops for TX. > 73 de G3KEV Though loop has any advantage if there is very bad enviroment (trees, buildings e t.c.) Antenna of a broadcasting station always is plased in clear field. So there is no reason to use loop in this case in my opinion. 73 de RA9MB/Alex http://www.qsl.net/ra9mb