Return-Path: Received: (qmail 7880 invoked from network); 16 Jul 2004 12:24:37 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ptb-spamcore02.plus.net) (192.168.71.3) by ptb-mailstore02.plus.net with SMTP; 16 Jul 2004 12:24:37 -0000 Received: from mailnull by ptb-spamcore02.plus.net with spamcore-l-b (Exim 4.32; FreeBSD) id 1BlRn0-000P3a-Ew for dave@picks.force9.co.uk; Fri, 16 Jul 2004 13:26:10 +0100 Received: from [192.168.67.1] (helo=ptb-mxcore01.plus.net) by ptb-spamcore02.plus.net with esmtp (Exim 4.32; FreeBSD) id 1BlRn0-000P3P-C5 for dave@picks.force9.co.uk; Fri, 16 Jul 2004 13:26:10 +0100 Received: from post.thorcom.com ([193.82.116.20]) by ptb-mxcore01.plus.net with esmtp (Exim 4.30; FreeBSD) id 1BlRlT-0005sN-2O for dave@picks.force9.co.uk; Fri, 16 Jul 2004 12:24:35 +0000 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1BlRl6-0003eQ-Bw for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Fri, 16 Jul 2004 13:24:12 +0100 Received: from [193.82.116.30] (helo=relay.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1BlRl6-0003eH-10 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 16 Jul 2004 13:24:12 +0100 Received: from nibbel.kulnet.kuleuven.ac.be ([134.58.240.41]) by relay.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1BlRl2-0002Cc-Pr for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 16 Jul 2004 13:24:12 +0100 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by nibbel.kulnet.kuleuven.ac.be (Postfix) with ESMTP id F3DE64B4C0 for ; Fri, 16 Jul 2004 14:24:02 +0200 (CEST) Received: from antonius.kulnet.kuleuven.ac.be (antonius.kulnet.kuleuven.ac.be [134.58.240.73]) by nibbel.kulnet.kuleuven.ac.be (Postfix) with ESMTP id A5BE94B43D for ; Fri, 16 Jul 2004 14:24:02 +0200 (CEST) Received: from dell-rik.fys.kuleuven.ac.be (pc-10-33-165-177.fys.kuleuven.ac.be [10.33.165.177]) by antonius.kulnet.kuleuven.ac.be (Postfix) with ESMTP id 821B54C0D1 for ; Fri, 16 Jul 2004 14:24:02 +0200 (CEST) Message-Id: <5.1.0.14.0.20040716141651.0197d248@u0019445.kuleuven.be> X-Sender: u0019445@u0019445.kuleuven.be X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.1 Date: Fri, 16 Jul 2004 14:31:53 +0200 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org From: Rik Strobbe In-Reply-To: <40F7C3CC.3060002@cytanet.com.cy> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Virus-Scanned: by KULeuven Antivirus Cluster X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: autolearn=no, Subject: Re: LF: Feeding grounded tower on 136KHz Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-Spam-Filtered: by PlusNet SpamCORE (v3.00) Content-transfer-encoding: 8bit Hello Geoff, a pity you cannot climb the tower or in any other way get a couple of wire up to the top. Shunt feeding will be very difficult as you will face a impedance of only a few micro-Ohms. So you can expect huge currents (= need of thick wire) and high losses in the matching circuitry. 60m might seem a lot, but it's only 2.7% of the wavelength. So scaled to 160m it's no more than a 4.5m tower or scaled to 20m just a 60cm tower. 73, Rik ON7YD At 15:02 16/07/2004 +0300, you wrote: >Hello, > >New to 136KHz. > >Callsigns: ZC4CW or ZC4LOW (for experiments). > >I need advice on using a grounded tower as a vertical radiator on 136KHz. >It's approximately 60m high and I can't climb it. This rules out some >of the existing methods which rely on accessing the top of the tower. >Shunt feeding has proven effective on 160m, however can this be done >on 136KHz. I would be open to other alternatives. > >Thankyou, > >Geoff > > > > >