Return-Path: Received: (qmail 39424 invoked from network); 25 Jul 2004 04:54:03 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ptb-spamcore01.plus.net) (192.168.71.1) by ptb-mailstore01.plus.net with SMTP; 25 Jul 2004 04:54:03 -0000 Received: from [192.168.67.1] (helo=ptb-mxcore01.plus.net) by ptb-spamcore01.plus.net with esmtp (Exim 4.32; FreeBSD) id 1Bob2F-0005aM-D9 for dave@picks.force9.co.uk; Sun, 25 Jul 2004 05:54:55 +0100 Received: from post.thorcom.com ([193.82.116.20]) by ptb-mxcore01.plus.net with esmtp (Exim 4.30; FreeBSD) id 1Bob1M-0008k7-Bz for dave@picks.force9.co.uk; Sun, 25 Jul 2004 04:54:01 +0000 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1Bob0i-0000nI-DR for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Sun, 25 Jul 2004 05:53:20 +0100 Received: from [193.82.116.30] (helo=relay.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1Bob0i-0000n9-2G for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 25 Jul 2004 05:53:20 +0100 Received: from ms.genesis-technology.com ([63.171.43.8]) by relay.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1Bob0e-0005mN-Cj for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 25 Jul 2004 05:53:20 +0100 Received: from genesiswireless.us (rev-65.165.20.192.genesiswireless.us [65.165.20.192]) by ms.genesis-technology.com (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id i6P4qZjt004031 for ; Sat, 24 Jul 2004 23:52:35 -0500 Message-ID: <41033D69.9030008@genesiswireless.us> Date: Sat, 24 Jul 2004 23:56:09 -0500 From: WE0H Mike User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030624 Netscape/7.1 (ax) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <1d4.267058b0.2e345a6d@aol.com> In-Reply-To: <1d4.267058b0.2e345a6d@aol.com> X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.36 X-Spam-Score: 1.2 (+) X-Spam-Report: autolearn=no,HTML_40_50=0.474,HTML_MESSAGE=0.001,HTML_TITLE_EMPTY=0.544,RATWR10_MESSID=0.111,TW_GV=0.077 Subject: Re: LF: Re: Loops v Verticals Content-Type: text/html; charset=windows-1252 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.0 required=5.0 tests=HTML_40_50,HTML_MESSAGE, HTML_TITLE_EMPTY autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-Spam-Filtered: by PlusNet SpamCORE (v3.00) Content-transfer-encoding: 8bit Bingo, 'Ego Trip'.

Mike
WE0H
WD2XGI

G4gvw@aol.com wrote:

Actually, that is not strictly true. If an experiment does not agree with theory then both the experiment and the theory need to be re-evaluated and both require validation and revue by a peer group. Unless such submissions are accepted as part of the due process then the exercise is pointless except as an ego trip!

g4gvw