Return-Path: Received: (qmail 31546 invoked from network); 23 Jul 2004 13:17:23 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ptb-spamcore01.plus.net) (192.168.71.1) by ptb-mailstore01.plus.net with SMTP; 23 Jul 2004 13:17:23 -0000 Received: from [192.168.67.3] (helo=ptb-mxcore03.plus.net) by ptb-spamcore01.plus.net with esmtp (Exim 4.32; FreeBSD) id 1Bnzw0-000Fnb-Cm for dave@picks.force9.co.uk; Fri, 23 Jul 2004 14:18:00 +0100 Received: from post.thorcom.com ([193.82.116.20]) by ptb-mxcore03.plus.net with esmtp (Exim) id 1BnzvN-000Ckj-6f for dave@picks.force9.co.uk; Fri, 23 Jul 2004 14:17:21 +0100 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1Bnzue-0004xG-QR for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Fri, 23 Jul 2004 14:16:36 +0100 Received: from [193.82.116.30] (helo=relay.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1Bnzue-0004x7-Fb for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 23 Jul 2004 14:16:36 +0100 Received: from cmsrelay02.mx.net ([165.212.11.111]) by relay.thorcom.net with smtp (Exim 4.34) id 1Bnzua-0006bX-Fm for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 23 Jul 2004 14:16:36 +0100 Received: from cmsapps02.cms.usa.net (165.212.11.138) by cmsoutbound.mx.net with SMTP; 23 Jul 2004 13:16:24 -0000 Received: from usa.net [151.41.154.152] by cmsapps02.cms.usa.net (ASMTP/dibene@usa.net) via mtad (C8.MAIN.3.13N) with ESMTP id 424igwNqw0137M38; Fri, 23 Jul 2004 13:16:23 GMT X-USANET-Auth: 151.41.154.152 AUTH dibene@usa.net usa.net Message-ID: <41010FB4.7010207@usa.net> Date: Fri, 23 Jul 2004 15:16:36 +0200 From: Alberto di Bene User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Win98; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030624 Netscape/7.1 (ax) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <01C470B0.228BAA70.actalbot@southsurf.com> In-Reply-To: <01C470B0.228BAA70.actalbot@southsurf.com> X-Spam-Score: 3.0 (+++) X-Spam-Report: autolearn=no,FAKE_HELO_USA_NET=2.8,RATWR10_MESSID=0.111,SARE_FREE_WEBM_Usa=0.077 Subject: LF: Re: Loops v Verticals Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: ** X-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.8 required=5.0 tests=FAKE_HELO_USA_NET autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-Spam-Filtered: by PlusNet SpamCORE (v3.00) Andy wrote: >Well... >That may not always be the case. > >If experimentation disagrees with theory you need to check that everything is >accounted for, before assuming the theory is wrong and reworking it. > >[...] > You just beated me in saying that. Look at the EH antenna, where a bunch of empirists pretend to rewrite the Maxwell's equations, on the basis of "a new theory of the electromagnetic field", which, unfortunately, noone of them has been able to put on paper using the language of science, mathematics. 73 Alberto I2PHD