Return-Path: Received: (qmail 25713 invoked from network); 18 Jul 2004 13:18:55 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ptb-spamcore02.plus.net) (192.168.71.3) by ptb-mailstore02.plus.net with SMTP; 18 Jul 2004 13:18:55 -0000 Received: from mailnull by ptb-spamcore02.plus.net with spamcore-l-b (Exim 4.32; FreeBSD) id 1BmBaz-0000wj-35 for dave@picks.force9.co.uk; Sun, 18 Jul 2004 14:20:49 +0100 Received: from [192.168.67.3] (helo=ptb-mxcore03.plus.net) by ptb-spamcore02.plus.net with esmtp (Exim 4.32; FreeBSD) id 1BmBaz-0000wP-10 for dave@picks.force9.co.uk; Sun, 18 Jul 2004 14:20:49 +0100 Received: from post.thorcom.com ([193.82.116.20]) by ptb-mxcore03.plus.net with esmtp (Exim) id 1BmBZ7-000M6U-LT for dave@picks.force9.co.uk; Sun, 18 Jul 2004 14:18:53 +0100 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1BmBYV-0005Dj-Rk for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Sun, 18 Jul 2004 14:18:15 +0100 Received: from [193.82.116.30] (helo=relay.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1BmBYV-0005Da-GQ for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 18 Jul 2004 14:18:15 +0100 Received: from adsl-217-106-91-194.ttn.ru ([217.106.91.194] helo=relay.dx.ru) by relay.thorcom.net with smtp (Exim 4.34) id 1BmBYR-0002FD-SK for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 18 Jul 2004 14:18:15 +0100 Received: (qmail 25136 invoked from network); 18 Jul 2004 17:17:59 +0400 Received: from ed.dx (10.0.1.11) by unix.dx with SMTP; 18 Jul 2004 17:17:59 +0400 Date: Sun, 18 Jul 2004 17:18:08 +0400 From: Ed Lesnichy X-Mailer: The Bat! (v1.60q) Personal Organization: Ed Lesnichy X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Message-ID: <32114277932.20040718171808@dx.ru> To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org In-Reply-To: <40F2CF45.30049.6CA6CC@localhost> References: <40F2CF45.30049.6CA6CC@localhost> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: autolearn=no, Subject: Re: LF: Receivers Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-Spam-Filtered: by PlusNet SpamCORE (v3.00) Dear LF-enthusiasts, Monday, July 12, 2004 Mike, G3XDV wrote: MD> I am compiling a list of receivers and transceivers suitable MD> for 136kHz. I know most of the older radios already but MD> does anyone use a radio made in, say, the last five years MD> that they use sucessfully? If so, does it need an LF pre- MD> amp? Is the noise blanker any good on LF QRN and/or MD> Loran? Is a narrow filter fitted as standard? During 3rd Rus LF DXpedition to UA0L I for the first time have seen old, but very interesting TRX - Yaesu FT-767GX. FT-767 on the sizes and design same as well as very popular old VHF/UHF/SHF FT-736, but: TX: abt 1.2....440MHz !! (TRX is made in abt 198?? ) RX: abt 10Hz...440MHz also !! I did not have opportunity to compare FT-767 with TS-850 on LF, but in urban Vladivostok on FT-767 and 80m dipole I well RX audible LF broadcasting stations from Siberia and Ural (abt 3000...5000km) and Alfa on 12...16kHz. The user's guide on English for FT-767 was not (only Japanese ;-((( I do not know sensitivity of the RX FT-767 on LF/VLF. Who used such RX on LF/VLF? I believe that using a divider 1:10 it is possible to use FT-767 and on TX (1.37MHz / 10 = 137kHz) 73! Ed RU6LA ed@dx.ru http://136.73.ru