Return-Path: Received: (qmail 53910 invoked from network); 25 Jul 2004 00:39:26 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ptb-spamcore02.plus.net) (192.168.71.3) by ptb-mailstore02.plus.net with SMTP; 25 Jul 2004 00:39:26 -0000 Received: from mailnull by ptb-spamcore02.plus.net with spamcore-l-b (Exim 4.32; FreeBSD) id 1BoX3t-0007U9-T2 for dave@picks.force9.co.uk; Sun, 25 Jul 2004 01:40:22 +0100 Received: from [192.168.67.2] (helo=ptb-mxcore02.plus.net) by ptb-spamcore02.plus.net with esmtp (Exim 4.32; FreeBSD) id 1BoX3t-0007U6-Qh for dave@picks.force9.co.uk; Sun, 25 Jul 2004 01:40:21 +0100 Received: from post.thorcom.com ([193.82.116.20]) by ptb-mxcore02.plus.net with esmtp (Exim) id 1BoX2x-000Ksr-Fa for dave@picks.force9.co.uk; Sun, 25 Jul 2004 00:39:23 +0000 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1BoX05-0007EI-Lk for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Sun, 25 Jul 2004 01:36:25 +0100 Received: from [193.82.116.30] (helo=relay.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1BoX05-0007E9-AX for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 25 Jul 2004 01:36:25 +0100 Received: from imo-d04.mx.aol.com ([205.188.157.36]) by relay.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1BoWzt-0003EP-Qa for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 25 Jul 2004 01:36:25 +0100 Received: from G4gvw@aol.com by imo-d04.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v37_r2.6.) id l.1d4.267058b0 (4004) for ; Sat, 24 Jul 2004 20:35:58 -0400 (EDT) From: G4gvw@aol.com Message-ID: <1d4.267058b0.2e345a6d@aol.com> Date: Sat, 24 Jul 2004 20:35:57 EDT To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: 9.0 for Windows sub 631 X-Spam-Score: 1.2 (+) X-Spam-Report: autolearn=no,HTML_30_40=0.809,HTML_MESSAGE=0.001,NO_REAL_NAME=0.285,TW_GV=0.077 Subject: Re: LF: Re: Loops v Verticals Content-Type: text/html; charset=windows-1252 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.1 required=5.0 tests=HTML_30_40,HTML_MESSAGE, NO_REAL_NAME autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-Spam-Filtered: by PlusNet SpamCORE (v3.00) Content-transfer-encoding: 8bit

Actually, that is not strictly true. If an experiment does not agree with theory then both the experiment and the theory need to be re-evaluated and both require validation and revue by a peer group. Unless such submissions are accepted as part of the due process then the exercise is pointless except as an ego trip!

g4gvw